[quote=“Fitzy, post: 766496, member: 236”]Good points there Kev alright. It seems to me that there has probably been an emphasis on upper body strength and extreme fitness in the last few years which has led to some AFL players being, well, top heavy (apologies for the non technical nature of my analysis). I kind of think this has led to an imbalance and the coaches and staff, having started this kind of conditioning, are now trying to catch up with the monster they have created and don’t actually know how manage players with this level of strength and fitness.The sport is massive in terms of money now and the competition to succeed is huge. I know of young club / rep players who are considered potential AFL players and the road to becoming a professional player in incredibly difficult. Inevitably some players, but more likely, many clubs, are taking short cuts. There’s no question now that doping / supplement programs in many forms are rife in the AFL.
Everyone is trying to find that edge, that 1% extra. The margins in professional sport as we know, are incredibly small. The fact that you have well known coaches, in some cases only recently retired from playing, engaging in these kind of short cuts speaks of the pressure they face to get results.
The quite remarkable nature of Essendons’ season last year and the amount of ACL injuries after what, 5 rounds this season demonstrate there is something clearly wrong.
Essendon might be flying at the moment, and they have GWS this weekend. But is there going to be another amazing collapse to their season? I reckon so. The Swans have looked rusty since the season started against not great competition (apart from Geelong), I reckon they’ll be far higher than the Bombers come September.[/quote]
I agree, they are could well be. Looking at the rotating door of games:fatigue ratio I think a good barometer for a team is the 6-8 game mark. If after this they are staying consistent them its fair to say they probably are on the right track.
Thing is, an this is wide spread in sport. Winning and talent can cover alot if poor training methods. Teams with the bet programs might get to play offs and that’s their lot. A super club like Collingwood could be surviving on a big squad and a revolving door of players but a shit Medical/ Conditioning program. You just don’t know in alot if cases. I have seen glimpses if what certain AFL clubs are doing, but if course I Do not see the whole picture so I’m suggesting/guessing alot. But here is a little run down. An it shows you different things work. If the top teAms at the moment.
Essedon -
Poor S&C,
dreadful medical decisions made in past few years,
Good likeable coach who players play for
Talented squad
Collingwood -
Very good S&C, Head guy is world renowned and there for years
An insider and well liked coach
Dreadful injury results
3 or 4 of the best players in the game
Massive support
Hawthorn -
Good S&C
Poor Coach (IMO)
Really talented players
Excellent off season recruitment
Poor mental toughness exposed at times
Geelong -
Anal Coach, probably a very good one, but can be overly negative sometimes (and very angry)
Really consistent. Same staff for years, great record of keeping guys fit
Some top players with big game mentality
Some top, not so athletic players, with great head/skills
Sydney -
No idea on medical/S&C staff
Temperamental coach
2-3 really class players, but nothing like other clubs
Super team mentality, high work rate
The common theme is talent. All the clubs have things going for them, but talent can trump any sort if planning. Different things also work for different groups.
Sydney are arguably the least talented of the “top team”. But they are the most together “team”. Goes along way.