So there would have been a crisis. And would you have been blaming Cooper, Umunna or whoever for that?
And what would have been the alternative policy?
Would it have been a softer Brexit, as Corbyn wants? Would it have been a second referendum, as a lot of people, but not enough, want? Would it have been Liechtenstein, as a lot of people but not nearly enough want, and which the Liechtensteiners and Norwegians do not want?
Is anybody who has voted for any aspect that even considers Brexit, ie. Article 50, or May’s deal, or has called for a softer Brexit, an enabler too?
That’s a hell of a lot of enablers if so.
It includes Ken Clarke, Yvette Cooper, Chuka Umunna and the SNP, the SDLP and Sinn Fein.
There’s even an argument to be made, I don’t think I agree with it, but some hold it, that the fervent arch-Remainers, through their failure to compromise and demands for a second referendum, are enabling the Tories towards pushing for a crash out.
Corbyn has at least tried to compromise and is trying to avoid a crash out above all.
While the Tory headbangers are pushing full speed for it.
Yet Corbyn is equally to blame, apparently.
Narratives and preconceived notions and all that.
None of these amendments you speak would really have any difference. Legislation would still have had to have be brought and passed because a crash out is the default in law, and likely wouldn’t have passed.