The difference maybe is that there is absolutely no doubt Boris was having sexual relations with that lady, and handing her taxpayer funded perks and contracts just so he could continue to do so.
If Leo or almost any other world leader did the same, he or she would be out on their ear. Itās hard to fathom exactly how Boris is still in office.
Thereās nothing obvious from that tweet ā Even if he is suggesting there was sexual relations, how is that homophobic ffs? Do gays have sex with other gays? Lads looking to get outraged at everything - fucking hellā¦
The point is to choose a comparator. If you would treat them differently or react differently then it suggests youāre not treating the two people equally.
I donāt think you would respond the same if paddy made that jibe at McEntee, thatās my point.
What has the stable relationship got to do with it? Isnāt Varadkar in a stable relationship? Should that change how you would respond? (Hint, no)
Thatās seems to me a different response altogether to what you said earlier.
What āballā is there to play? Cosgrave decided to aim a homophobic dog whistle at Varadkar. The issue is Cosgraveās homophobia.
Anybody who has seen what Cosgrave posts on Twitter knows he lost the right to be taken in any way seriously a long time ago. Heās a self-obsessed gobshite with nothing to say, who is desperate to keep himself relevant by saying any oulā hateful shite.
The people Cosgraveās posts are aimed at know exactly what they mean. Then he claims plausible deniability. Then useful idiots who donāt support him jump to his defence, not having a clue what theyāre doing.
What Cosgrave is doing is an example of the horseshoe effect. Heās trying to unite the racist, homophobic far right with the ultra-cynical, tankie far left - and Iām not talking about People Before Profit, Iām talking about self-identified āleftā people with no real ideology beyond āburn it all downā, āPutin is some manā etc. etc. The far right is always the dominant player in that alliance.
And heās doing it purely for his own narcissism.
Suggesting they were going at it for political/monetary benefits is nasty unless thereās proof, iām not sure anyone is defending that element of itā¦ but the homophobia card is laughable. Standard FG tactic around Varadkar at this stage - theyāve played it a few times with SF also.
I was on about you nose diving back to the 80s and psychoanalyzing the country then and Paddy attempting to tap into that energy through this photoā¦ a bit loose itself.
By all means slate him for the suggesting that there was benefits to any relationship ā¦but maybe iām just a bit more evolved than the rest but I dont see homophobia in there at all. Gays have sex with other gaysā¦ youāve drawn all the rest of it out from your own issues with gay people.