The answer is staff living on site until the crisis eases. Many who have a family member working in the sector probably wouldnât agree with that idea but thatâs the only answer.
Obviously hygiene standards are lax and staff are carrying the virus into the homes.
Families of nursing home occupants arenât allowed visit so any other reason bandied about is horseshit.
It isnât really imo. Itâs far more likely the virus is everywhere and has been for a while now. If a 1000 people between the ages of 25 and 45 get the flu how many die? If 1000 thousand nursing home occupants get it the death rate is much higher Iâd imagine. Nursing homes had visiting restrictions before we went into lock down too and i severely doubt the hygiene of the nurses is an issue or it would be an issue in hospitals too.
While it would be ideal if we could do them. The UK doing them would be a start as we arenât far off them. Itâs give us an idea of whether itâs worth us finding out anyway
There seems to be huge variance between countries in the death rate, testing patterns, cases etc. I donât know could you build a strategy based out of reports from anywhere else.
Well if you found out that say 30% of the UK was infected. You could at least say, right itâs worthwhile us checking ourselves and seeing what the story is here. If they found no major difference it wouldnât be worth wasting the lab time and energy.
Italy are including deaths of people who test positive but arenât effected by the virus in their deaths apparently. Iâm not sure other countries are doing that.