I actually think the school disruption argument is a stronger one as it doesnāt look to directly contradict NIACs fact-based approach although if has been suggested that one positive case in a class from an (unvaccinated kid) will require isolation anyway then maybe that argument is largely moot too.
I suppose the point that also needs to be factored in is there are some teachers who arent fit and healthy or have underlying conditions who arent able to go back to school as it currently stands and this readjustment means they are out longer still. I know of tow personally, one pregnant teacher and another who has an immune type condition, but both young and relatively healthy but have conditions that if they got Covid would leave them in a vulnerable position. The pregnant teacher isnt massively fussed, she will be going on maternity leave one way or another in a few weeks anyway, but she still would have liked to have been able to go back. The other one is frustrated hugely. His GP advised heād be getting his vaccine in May, but heās not sure now.
And Iām sure there are many more who will refuse to go back in because of the fear factor. And many more where the roll out is just going to come whenever it does and it was potentially going to be summer anyway so it doesnt make much difference to them one way or another, just as long as it is in place before September.
well considering she has had 3 miscarriages on her last 3 pregnancies, I doubt timing had anything to do with it. As much as you hate teachers, they still have lives to live and there is no need to be an absolute cunt the whole time over teachers.
Yeah plenty of time. Meanwhile the school has to get in sub teachers to cover when students will be back in. And when there is already a shortage of sub teachers. It leaves the school more vulnerable to shut down as explained earlier.
Iāve got some integrity about me. If I was unhappy with my job or career I would leave and move on. I wouldnāt try and hold my employer to ransom to meet my demands.