Put everyone on a flat industrial wage for as long as lockdowns lastâŚstarting with the politicians, doctors and scientists. Youâll soon see a very different approach, and a very different science emerging from the makey uppy one that some simpletons have bought into
I canât see any other way around it if the last 13 months are the precedent mate.
Okay, weâve the vaccines but theyâre not permament and are not guaranteed to stop transmission or provide full immunity. Will we have everyone in the country and everyone coming in vaccinated by then?
This is the zero covid route we are on - I totally disagree with it, but thats how I see it playing out potentially.
You have an extraordinarily simplistic way of looking at this problem. I was talking recently to four people, thirties to sixties, who got the virus in 2021. For most people, having Covid is no picnic while it lasts. Only a few would be happy to get it, I imagine.
Equally, âlong Covidâ is a big issue for many people. There is the question now of reinfection. There is the question of variants. There is likewise the interplay between personal liberties and government actions â the âvaccine passportâ issue, as the shorthand goes.
All of these issues cannot be wished away by your blitheness or sloganeering about 'âzero Covidâ.
I agree we shouldnât open everything up just yet. There should be a middle ground between the vulnerable being vaccinated and every single person in the country being vaccinated though for when we should get back to normal
Iâm against stupidity. The first lockdown in March was valid as we had no idea how bad things would get, and how well people would react to voluntary restrictions. After that you need to look at how well lockdowns worked in terms of containing spread, preventing a winter wave, and how bad the winter wave was. Thereâs plenty data to look at, but the evidence is that lockdowns after summer 2020 did nothing significant. From that point on only peopleâs behavior mattered, and the fact such a high percentage of the population had not been exposed. A high percentage having no immunity, a virus that spreads like wildfire, heading into winter when people are mostly indoors and have compromised immunity. A very bad combination.
It didnât prevent 160k further cases and 2.6k deaths though did it?
And what youâre saying is speculative.
South Africa and India are examples of two countries who never entered lockdowns again when the â2nd/3rd waveâ came and they did not fair any worse in relative terms than countries who did enter lockdowns.
178k daily cases is the Irish equivalent of 885 daily cases. Over a month after level 5 (early Feb) Ireland was still having in excess of 1k daily cases.
So was Ireland destroyed by Covid in spite of lockdowns or because of them? Something isnât adding up here.
A lockdown was needed because your government told people in early December to go enjoy themselves over the holidays, go to the pub, and go to mass. Exactly the opposite of what they should have recommended.
But we had lockdown here throughout December and it made no difference, we were also devastated in January.