Youâll do anything to avoid the point. MHQ is an unfair measure because it disproportionately affects weaker people in society. It is unfair because there is no transparency to it: what are the criteria for a country to get on the list? None. What are the criteria for a successful appeal? None (unless you can afford a high court appeal, then youâll be let out). It is also unfair because it is disproportionate to the point of being stupid. Locking up people who have tested negative while people who test positive in Ireland can carry on about their day is unfair, pointless, stupid, ridiculous, laughable, and anything else you want to add there.
Can you explain exactly how people are âburying their heads in the sandâ?
If you believe that I genuinely think you are an idiot.
Heâs given a couple of clear examples of it in his recent posts.
Everything about this pandemic disproportionately affects the weaker in society.
Mandatory Hotel Quarantine affects the weaker in society to far less of a degree than the virus or internal restrictions or forcing people to work.
Calling somebody an idiot is not an argument.
Ah I was only really talking about you. Youâve told me no truck-drivers or seamen use the airport.
He hasnât.
Lay out exactly when, why and how they do, and how often.
How often every individual truck driver uses the airport? Will I contact every haulage company?
Iâve made an argument.
Youâve offered nothing to contradict it bar âsure it might be doing some bit to help we donât know but itâs better than nothing.â
Now that is not an argument.
Also not an argument.
What data is being collected and reported on regarding side effectsâŚparticularly long term side effectsâŚand throw in a few studies regarding effects on fertility, pregnancy, birth defects etcâŚthe standard sort of data that would go along with granting approval to a new treatment?
(I think reports of myocarditis mostly relate to young men)
He gave you the example of his two essential worker colleagues. We prefer not to test them than use antigen tests. That is a strong example of Irelandâs ostrich approach.
Well youâre the person making the argument. I donât think itâs unreasonable for you to be asked to elaborate on it.
The only âargumentâ youâre offering is bitching against it. Thatâs not an argument.
He works at the airport. People who work at the airport donât need to travel. If they don;t work at the airport they arenât his colleagues.
Wrong.
If you work at the airport, why would you need to travel internationally?
Iâll indulge you. Truck drivers in Ireland are mainly Eastern European (though Iâve seen a lot of South Africans recently too). Truck drivers get old and retire, get sick, get sick of it, haulage companies expand. All of that requires new drivers. It also takes two or three drivers to complete very long journeys. One driver might fly ahead to meet the truck. If I had to quantify it Iâd say thereâs dozens of them a day.
Seamen are rarer. Less than 10 a day. Same logic. Replacing existing seamen. Change of crew.
All exempt from tests