He canât explain why because itâs a bullshit claim. The threat to society has always been how many of the vulnerable population are getting infected, as they (overwhelmingly) are the ones who end up in hospital or dying from Covid. The ZeroCoviders are still singing from the same hymnbook as March 2020 as if nothing has changed. What has changed is that the vulnerable are vaccinated and the people getting infected now are mostly not susceptible to serious illness.
If you take the US as an example, 60% of adults are fully vaccinated and roughly 20% have had Covid, so that leaves 20% without immunity. The overwhelming number of that ~50 million people are in the 18-40 age bracket, and the #1 reason given by them for not getting vaccinated is they do not believe they are at risk of serious illness from Covid. By and large they are of course right, the US is running at about 300 Covid deaths a day, out of the total 8,000 that die each day. In comparison heart disease kills close to 2,000 a day and cancer 1,600 a day.
So the question is why would you impose restrictions again because of a disease that is responsible for 4% of overall deaths and has a infection mortality rate of ~0.2%? More significantly why would you impose restrictions to protect a subset of young healthy people who refuse to get vaccinated? The answer is you wouldnât, they have had the opportunity to get vaccinated and have declined, so they have chosen to take the risk.
He canât explain it because heâs a Walter Mitty bullshitter who can only respond with stuff like kango!, done with covid! and then cringeworthy analogies. Heâs in denial to the actual data @Malarkey