Direct Provision

Whatā€™s the score here @Rocko @Little_Lord_Fauntleroy? 175m seems like fuckall to set up 6 centres and all the infrastructure that goes with it in terms of supports etc. Thatā€™s before even going near the actual building of gaffs. Are the Greens being given enough rope to hang themselves on an aspirational white paper or have they thought this through properly?

UNBELIEVABLE SCENES. As Iā€™m hitting reply on a post questioning the governmentā€™s commitment to deliver housing for asylum seekers, the minister for Housing Daire O Brien drives into the estate, eyeballs me, and then reverses and drives back up the road! SF wouldnt be at that level of intimadatory craic.

3 Likes

did you not just hop in the back of the berlingo and show him a twix, the plausibly deniable 2 fingers

Are they going to start building houses and apartments? Or hope that as people switch to WFH thereā€™ll be a higher vacancy rate which can be taken up by renting?

Leaving people stuck in a system for years was cruel and made no sense. Hopefully the screening is sped up so people fleeing harm can be given leave to stay and start work and education. And also bogus claimants can be quickly deported so they arenā€™t taking up space allowed for genuine cases.

1 Like

A lot more in this post that would help address the issues than the, and I hate to say it, virtue signalling with no actual details as set out in that press release/white paper

@Lazarus getting shit done again I see :clap: :clap:

1 Like

Whoever the minister for this is was very unconvincing on Newstalk earlier. Despite been given a fairly soft time of it.
Where are the houses coming from? Weā€™ll build them. But thereā€™s huge housing waiting lists already? Yes but these will be different houses.

You say you are going to cut waiting lists to 4 months? Yes
But the waiting lists are supposed to be 9 months already and they actually a year and a half.
Yes but we will cut them.

I wasnā€™t left with the impression that thereā€™s any substance to the plan unfortunately.

Let em all in ta fuck.

1 Like

Roderick Oā€™Gorman.
That will send the usual suspects even more outraged.

Nearly the fairest thing to do would be to just let them in after 4 months and put them at the back of the housing list but weā€™d have tens of thousands of homeless black people.

1 Like

Grossly unfair to those on the housing list for up to 12 years,
as those coming out of DP will be housed within months
( That information came out today on radio so I presume itā€™s correct as it was a well versed elected rep stated it)

How should the state treat people looking for asylum?

How many of the 175 pages of a detailed white paper did you read before arriving at the conclusion it was ā€œvirtue signalling?ā€ It must amaze you that any time you analyse something you donā€™t agree with that you find it amounts to virtue signalling.

4 Likes

Oh you have the answers. Great. Where is the increased housing stock going to come from and how are the processing times going to be shortened?

Thereā€™s ā‚¬600m allocated over the two phases. Direct provision costs a fortune currently. There is both incremental spend and replacement spend. By not funding the private enterprises there is more capacity to deliver.

2 Likes

How many long term contracts are we locked into with private providers?

1 Like

does this mean my boycott of avoca can end?

Ah you havenā€™t read it. But youā€™ll find a way to be disagreeable as ever on matters of human rights and will still deny your obvious racism. A pathetic sort of existence.

1 Like

I think the govt didnā€™t think this through as usual, as itā€™s already causing confusion ,no one on the housing list will be happy ( thousands)
If the fuckers restarted building social housing properly as in the 60s -70s theyā€™d be no need for anyone jumping ahead of those on the list

Yes. Cheesy sourdough for all again.

huzzah

1 Like