Hahaha so there are no answers, I think Iāll save myself 175 pages of waffle aimed at placating a Mickey mouse political party with little connection to the real world. Pity you donāt have the ability to critically assess whether something will work instead of just cheerleading whatevers shovelled your direction.
Itās ok to admit you didnāt read it and wouldnāt understand it anyway. Iāve explained the funding but in your exuberance at spouting your reactionary right wing views you forgot to read my other post. An absolute simpleton.
INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION APPLICANTS will spend no more than four months in six State-owned, not-for-profit centres before moving into their own accommodation under a new model aimed at ending the institutionalised Direct Provision system by 2024.
No you gave a nonsense political speak answer when I asked the two most pertinent questions. You just donāt have the backbone to assess something properly, just happy for the few likes. Take the little pat on the head and donāt get all upset when nothing happens.
Ah so if this comes to pass, and thatās a big if, itāll still be direct provision but now state owned. So just renamed to keep the harmless sorts happy. And letās ignore that processing times and associated issues
There are some contracts but theyāll be used in the short term as the accommodation is developed. Thereās no prospect of paying any private provider beyond the time frame they are actually supplying accommodation. There were some concerns about potential litigation around competitiveness etc but those have been dealt with in advance.
Direct provision is just a name. The (general) objections to the system arenāt related to the concept of the state providing for people, directly or indirectly. Again, itās abundantly clear you havenāt a clue what youāre talking about here.
And one of those main objectiions is processing times and how long people are left without a final decision. I asked how thatās going to be addressed, instead of answer, you started shrieking.
Along with the provision of housing, own homes or rooms, the other real world issue. You donāt have an answer to either. Itās ok, youāre not a serious party. Community cars in rural areas and wolves. Gotcha.
Iāve been thinking a bit about this āown homeā thing. Thereās no fucking way itās going to happen. The state canāt even build its own direct provision centres or enough houses for the housing lost and now weāre told that itās going to build a constant supply of thousands of homes for people coming out of direct provision? Nothing is going to change. These people will all stay exactly where they are at the moment except now they will be able to get jobs and āintegrateā. The government should be aware if the slightly questionable optics of this thing and be honest about whatās going to happen.