[QUOTE=“Sidney, post: 1134478, member: 183”]Did he drill massive holes in the wall?
Thanks for calling me “Dr” by the way, but I’m not a doctor and don’t have a PHD.[/QUOTE
He did and it was real gory , you were one of the lads who loved the facials in there …Dr[/QUOTE]
He needs to put down the glasses before he flings them at someone. Doesn’t come across as likeable at all.
Poor debate, too many voices. Quinn the best for the no side, Fitzgerald doing well for yes.
[QUOTE=“dodgy-keeper, post: 1134495, member: 1552”]He needs to put down the glasses before he flings them at someone. Doesn’t come across as likeable at all.
Poor debate, too many voices. Quinn the best for the no side, Fitzgerald doing well for yes.[/QUOTE]
I thought the minister for justice was very poor in this debate.
you would rather be on the side of the knuckle draggers that do voice such sentiments then?
[QUOTE=“Nembo Kid, post: 1132246, member: 2514”]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjnrLt3VuSM
No.[/QUOTE]
he seems to have done some excelent research there.
i can only assume that HBV and the rest of the noanderthals did similar extensive research.
i am voting yes.
I was voting yes to begin with in line with my bleeding heart liberal cheese eating surrender monkey beliefs but i have to say the thought of the rage a yes vote will spark in the bible bashers and the gay bashers alike is downright thrilling.
if you find yourself on the same side of the argument as a man who supports fianna fail, wrote possibly the sh1test eurovision song ever and spent a period of time riding Sinead O`Connor then you have to seriously question your sanity
[QUOTE=“twiceasnice97, post: 1134572, member: 1061”]he seems to have done some excelent research there.
i can only assume that HBV and the rest of the noanderthals did similar extensive research.
i am voting yes.
I was voting yes to begin with in line with my bleeding heart liberal cheese eating surrender monkey beliefs but i have to say the thought of the rage a yes vote will spark in the bible bashers and the gay bashers alike is downright thrilling.
if you find yourself on the same side of the argument as a man who supports fianna fail, wrote possibly the sh1test eurovision song ever and spent a period of time riding Sinead O`Connor then you have to seriously question your sanity[/QUOTE]
you like bogball mate, you are a bible bashing hick
[QUOTE=“twiceasnice97, post: 1134572, member: 1061”]he seems to have done some excelent research there.
i can only assume that HBV and the rest of the noanderthals did similar extensive research.
i am voting yes.
I was voting yes to begin with in line with my bleeding heart liberal cheese eating surrender monkey beliefs but i have to say the thought of the rage a yes vote will spark in the bible bashers and the gay bashers alike is downright thrilling.
if you find yourself on the same side of the argument as a man who supports fianna fail, wrote possibly the sh1test eurovision song ever and spent a period of time riding Sinead O`Connor then you have to seriously question your sanity[/QUOTE]
If you find yourself on the same side as a man who sticks his penis inside another man then you would also have to question your sanity.
What if that man is against gay marriage?
You detest sex between a man and a woman, and also between a man and a man. Have you ever considered becoming a priest? Your method of debating and preaching would be well suited to it.
[QUOTE=“twiceasnice97, post: 1134572, member: 1061”]he seems to have done some excelent research there.
i can only assume that HBV and the rest of the noanderthals did similar extensive research.
i am voting yes.
I was voting yes to begin with in line with my bleeding heart liberal cheese eating surrender monkey beliefs but i have to say the thought of the rage a yes vote will spark in the bible bashers and the gay bashers alike is downright thrilling.
if you find yourself on the same side of the argument as a man who supports fianna fail, wrote possibly the sh1test eurovision song ever and spent a period of time riding Sinead O`Connor then you have to seriously question your sanity[/QUOTE]
Ah yes, the old no voters are backward Neanderthals arguement. 
the gpa have come out again in favour of this
Wish I had a postal vote I’d be voting a resounding NO
Sick of been told how I should think regarding homosexuals and immigration, bullyboy tactics and treatment if you don’t row in with the crowd fucking sheep Ireland is going down the toilet very fast
NO NO NO NO
Where is the line in the sand ? …the good ordinary people need to make a stand NO NO NO
Ha ha ha every priest I know personally has a regular “squeeze” …randy bastards the clergy !
[QUOTE=“Sean stack, post: 1135411, member: 3055”]NO NO NO NO
Where is the line in the sand ? …the good ordinary people need to make a stand NO NO NO[/QUOTE]
http://i1.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/article3400434.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/Ray-Burke.jpg
[QUOTE=“Sam Swarek, post: 1135375, member: 2293”]Wish I had a postal vote I’d be voting a resounding NO
Sick of been told how I should think regarding homosexuals and immigration, bullyboy tactics and treatment if you don’t row in with the crowd fucking sheep Ireland is going down the toilet very fast[/QUOTE]
It’s not a referendum on fucking sheep, much as you might want it to be.
But if a man marries a man …the next step is a man from bruff marrying a sheep …the line in the sand has to be drawn
Why is a constitutional change required to allow Same Sex Marriage? The Constitution does not define marriage and, at present, does not set out who is entitled to marry or who is not entitled to marry.
A change in legislation is all that is needed.
[QUOTE=“TheUlteriorMotive, post: 1135503, member: 2272”]Why is a constitutional change required to allow Same Sex Marriage? The Constitution does not define marriage and, at present, does not set out who is entitled to marry or who is not entitled to marry.
A change in legislation is all that is needed.[/QUOTE]
I made this point previously. A referendum technically is not needed.
You could also argue that the rights of minorities should not be decided by the majority.
Having a referendum unfortunately brings the knuckle draggers out of the woodwork. The positive side is that when they lose, they’ll no longer be able to claim they are a silent majority, not they were ever silent.
i have a little fetish that some knuckledraggers might find difficult to get their small minded brains around. myself and the wife are quite open, dont get me wrong she is a fucking mentalist bitch like the majority but she is open to new experiences and doesnt spend 24/7 obsessing where i am and who i am with like my first wife did. in the months before we were married we hired an escort in london and we both had a right lash off of her for an hour in a hotel room in londonbridge. it was a planned thing and led to two more episodes in dublin but kids arrived etc etc and we called a halt. the good lady took ill in recent years and temporarily had to bow out of all tomfoolery but during this period i was encouraged to book myself a treat or two and in fact the first time this occurred the escort was chosen and booked as we sat together on the couch one night. we are open like that. we watch a bit of porn together, i get the blessing to go and treat myself and so on. we have discussed swinging but wouldnt know where to start and have probably missed the boat in terms of vintage and are probably lacking the energy to jump into that scene. no secrets (as such) between us.
im sure the world is loaded with folk like us. normal people who want a shade more than what the majority would term normal.
why cant i bring another lady into our marriage? what, legally/morally etc is the stumbling block that is stopping me and my wife from introducing a third party into our union that we both might love and want to share our lives with?
why in gods name is this illegal does anyone know? why would people who might find themselves in this scenario be discriminated against?
who are the defending lobby group here does anyone know?