That’s a fair number of years ago now. Anyhow, most moderately successful people have little foibles in their back catalogue and these lads possibly aren’t any different.
We aren’t all paragons of virtue like a previous observer but I’m having a laugh here at your phrase Post-Covid Mohill. It sounds slightly apocalyiptic.
We didn’t have luminaries like Bressie to advise and cajole us in our little moments of darkness back then. It’s doubtful if doing 50 press-ups and taking long walks through the countryside would have saved them unfortunate cats but we’ll never know now.
How wonderful it is to be young now, every little trouble catered for by counseling, medication, altered diets, exercise, therapists or other means. Costly as well…
If the Wi-Fi was deactivated for a week we’d have carnage on an apocalyptic scale.
wonder what the number is where it doesnt really matter any more? Like, kill 1 or 2 cats, shocking. Killing 20 odd cats mad. But is say 10 cats as shocking as 22? Law of diminishing cats or something?
I’m not sure if you need to be a snowflake to think that strangling and killing 22 random cats is a bit deranged and borderline, if not fully, psychopathic. Or that boredom or being depressed is an excuse for doing it “back in the good aul days”.
We had no WiFi when I was 14, if somebody did that they would have been ostracised at TE least, probably had seven shades of shit kicked out of them, though obviously you’d be more than slightly afraid, giving them a jokey nickname and excusing it as the actions of an good lad’ would be fairly low on the list of priorities, a psychopath
@Juhniallio, my apologies, perhaps it wasn’t in one day, it makes no difference to me though, he still counted to 22