ā¬400k a year - of which ā¬200k goes to the exchequer.
It really grinds my gears when I see successful people getting a hard time in the media for ālargeā pay packets with no acknowledgement of the huge chunk they pay in tax.
Delaney was netting about ā¬17k a month, that isnāt a lot of money for a role you could be turfed out of any time.
Who has the power to turf Delaney out of his job? Only himself. And not before he gets himself a new role, of his own choosing. I presume in time weāll find out that he got a pay off to step aside/across/up/down/around. And a relocation fee for moving offices. Or even just changing the title on the door.
I know there has been an expectation that I will wade into this issue and bring some perspective from the boardroom table. It makes sense that one of the forums leading businessmen should make a call on a matter thatās probably beyond the grasp of some of the less experienced members of the forum.
Having looked at all the āevidenceā and material it is clear to me that Mr Delaney has done an exceptional job for the FAI and we are blessed he will stay on in his new role.
Executive remuneration regularly grand headlines but my evaluation is that Mr Delaney was grossly underpaid and a 25% commission on the 5m he singlehandly won from fifa would be a gesture that would make a lot of sense.
This sentiment is a little rich coming from you @Juhniallio
Iāve regularly seen you put loose vending stock such as mars bars into your pocket following a call out to fix a machine . You seemed not to view this unauthorized gratuity from your employer as legitimate yet are very quick to point the finger at mr Delaney
Heās right tbf. In a lot of cases these roles are relatively short. Youāre talking 5 years of big money for giving up a lot of your life in the process with a lot of risk.
Doesnāt mean that there arenāt corporate governance failures or whatever, but often miss the context of people earning big money.