"There wasnāt enough strength in the entirely false anti-Semitic allegation to sustain campaign against me. So what do we next? We go for the anti-women thing, the misogynist line. This is part and parcel of the current non-debate where you are in conflict with political correctness.
āThere is no evidence against you - that is fine. You call somebody a misogynist, or an Islamophobe or Xenophobe or a bigot or a racist. No evidence is required. Those words alone, uttered with sufficient vehemence and frequency on the internet, will destroy your reputation - and that is what happened to meā
Ha ha, is this what Myers is reduced to now? This is glorious.
Quick question to Kevin. If you did nothing wrong why did you apologise and accept that The Times were correct to sack you? This is where your attempts at revisionism fall down.
Thatās why heās reduced to doing roadshows in these kips. Itās going to be hilarious watching the bitter oul fucker moan about the injustice of it all and how badly he was treated.
As expected the usual suspects are ignoring the content and Just lashing out in defence of a group of people who are not offended.
That is the basis of his talk and the reaction to it by you here literally vindicates him. Itās really fascinating.
Itās all outlined in chronological order in that article. You havenāt read it, why donāt you start there and then decide if your crusade to take offence on behalf of a group of people who are not offended is the correct crusade for today.