Sick fucker.
+1
its bad enough that us norms are forcing these poor sluts to have sex with us
you dont understand how anyone might see a difference between marriage and parenthood?
are you aware of the different responsibilities associated with each?
i love the argument that sure legalise cannabis, would it be any worse than the legal drugs that are currently destroying society?
You’re probably referring to a similarly disabled woman? Ever imagine that you might not be attracted to them. Just because you lose the use of your legs or whatever doesn’t mean you stop desiring Angelina Jolie. As I said, go to that escort ireland forum. There are prostitutes from Ireland and England and Brazil and many places. Not trafficked. Happy to help out disabled or elderly guys. And enjoy their work. You’re woefully ignorant on this topic.
if prostitution could be regulated and administered properly, made into a proper profession or trade , i would be in favour of legalising it without doubt.
sex between consenting adults is not an activity that causes much harm, unlike drugs or drink for example. i dont believe in this addiction nonsense myself.
some good examples by thrawneen of disabled, elderly etc who all need a ride and are being deprived by a law. add to that the hordes that are walking the streets who are potential rapists simply because they have no outlet.
You mean sex addiction?
You haven’t made any substantive point there.
One of the rights that comes with marriage is that it allows you to be considered as a prospective foster parent. That right is indivisible from marriage.
Again, if you agree with recognition of gay couples in law but are against gay adoption, you are not in favour of marriage for gay people, you are in favour of a civil partnership.
single people can adopt children Sid
Yes but unmarried couples cannot jointly adopt a child. All married couples can apply to do so. If you don’t allow a gay couple to do that then by definition it isn’t marriage.
forget about the law for a minute(you quote it when it suits you, but scoff at it when it doesn’t, for example drugs etc)
should couples be allowed raise a child simply because they have signed a legal document to say they are married?
im not against gay marriage as any 2 idiots/psychos/deviants can marry, they can harm nobody but themselves.
i am against a child having 2 fathers and no mother or 2 mothers and no father without them having a say in the decision themselves
You’re missing the whole point of marriage in this country, it is recognised as the optimal basis for the family unit. What you’re talking about, “any 2 idiots/psychos/deviants can marry, they can harm nobody but themselves” is a civil union, as pointed out above. Marriage also grants tax advantages etc, again, encouraging marriage as fundamentally good thing for family, children and society.
Sidney is all over this already anyway.
No. That’s why vetting procedures exist.
What about the multitude of kids with one mother and no father, because the useless cunt ficked off? They don’t get much of a say.
What if you’re disabled from the neck down and can’t whack off?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20165371
[font=Arial][size=4]The mayor of Amsterdam says he will not ban foreign tourists from using the city’s famous cannabis cafes, after months of argument over new drug laws.[/size][/font]
could be landmark ruling in Irish euthanasia today…
Ruling sought on assisted suicide
A WOMAN confined to a wheelchair and in the final stages of multiple sclerosis has asked the High Court to rule whether she has a constitutional right to be assisted in taking her own life.
Marie Fleming (59), from Co Wicklow, is past the point where she can take her life by her own hand but wants to establish the right to end her life with someone else’s assistance, the court was told. She requires 24-hour care, has difficulties swallowing and speaking, and her condition is incurable and debilitating.
A specially convened divisional High Court, comprising the High Court president Mr Justice Nicholas Kearns, Mr Justice Gerard Hogan and Mr Justice Paul Carney, will hear her case on December 4th.
While suicide is not illegal, it is an offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison under the Criminal Law Suicide Act 1993 for a person to be an accomplice to such an act.
Ronan Murphy SC, for Ms Fleming, told Mr Justice Kearns yesterday his client was challenging the constitutionality of the 1993 Act as it interfered with her rights to autonomy and dignity.
He wanted an early hearing because Ms Fleming was in the final stages of MS and past the point of ending her life without assistance.
In her action against Ireland, the Attorney General and the DPP, Ms Fleming, a former UCD law lecturer, wants an order declaring section 2 (2) of the 1993 Act invalid under the Constitution and incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.
Alternatively, she wants an order requiring the DPP to issue guidelines on what factors will be taken into account when a decision is being made whether to prosecute a person who assists her suicide.
Lawyers for the Attorney General and the DPP said they had no objection to an early hearing. Paul O’Higgins SC, for the DPP, said the case would largely be a matter of legal argument rather than evidence. There was an amount of case law from other jurisdictions, in particular Canada, which would have to be looked at.
Mr Justice Kearns said it was a very important case with far-reaching implications. He fixed December 4th for the hearing and said the case could be mentioned to him again in a week.
Ms Fleming’s partner and full-time carer, Tom Curran, previously said he was prepared to assist her in ending her life. Mr Curran, an IT professional, is the co-ordinator of the Irish branch of Exit International, an international end-of-life information organisation campaigning for the legalisation of assisted suicide
great stuff- the Irish will eventually follow
Hope so. Could be a serious tourism boost for the Country :lol: :lol: