Known to police?
1 Like
Think @the_man_himself will go to ground now.
Huh? All I see in that google drive is a load of whatsapps/texts
Backtrack.
You said RTE wouldnât report on something without it being proof checked.
You are as convincing framing a defence as Leo Varadkar.
1 Like
I have already said Leo has to go mate
Letâs just wait for the National parliament to decide on election winner Sinn FĂŠinâs motion.
An election may well be needed.
Paddy will make a great Taoiseach youâd feel
1 Like
Charlie tanagain going with the âdonât hit me when I have the brexit and covid babies in my armsâ defence
1 Like
Youâre deflecting now.
Youâre trying to contend that RTE have reported on this diligently, address the point youâre running away from.
RTE have a track record of reporting on hearsay, why was this different when they were provided with information that does not seem to be contended by the accused party.
Fair play to Charlie, always putting the State first
1 Like
Guys can we keep this to politics please and refrain from gay and asexual bashing
Thank you.
Fixed
My posts donât require fixing old friend
1 Like
Is it not likely that their previous of getting done for defamation would discourage them from doing it in the future? Didnât they have to pay Sean Gallagher damages as well?
No its not.
They do it routinely.
They just decided not to do it on information provided to them that was accurate. Itâs seems bizarre that you are defending it when seemingly you donât have a basis or clue as to why you are.
It was Martin McGuinness who made the allegations live on RTE.
1 Like
When have they reported on hearsay that has been sent to them in the form of text messages and whatsapps recently?
Are you a bit simple? RTE routinely report on hearsay from unquoted sources. This was actually substantive evidence they were provided from a named source that they refused to report on. Youâre doing a good job of tearing your own argument apart.
The truth matters to RTĂ, donât you know.
1 Like
When?