A screenshot is proof 
You do know screenshots can be edited and phone numbers can be edited to change the names?
Yes.
A screenshot is proof. They had a named source and the screenshots are genuine, none of the accused parties have questioned their veracity.
Screenshots are not proof mate. It is incredibly easy to edit a screenshot.
And RTE reported on them when Leo was questioned and didnāt deny them
The stupidity is strong in that fella
Youāre talking out of your hole again. Screenshots are proof, they are regularly used in courts of law - nevermind media, you docile fuckwit. Stop talking out your arse about things you donāt have the slightest clue about
So shut the fuck up talking absolutely ridiculous bollocks.
I think you have that worded incorrectly, they didnāt report on the story until 8/9 hours after Varadkarās spin team released a statement. Youāve self-defeated your argument here on the reasoning behind it.
Screenshots are not proof on their own mate. Screenshots can be edited incredibly easily. A screenshot which is taken for a court case will have been verified for accuracy before it gets to court.
I donāt follow RTE as much as you mate, I couldnāt tell you how many hours late they were. They have reported on the matter all week since
This is getting unseemly now
You have completely changed your tune now.
Screenshots are proof, simple as that so you should withdraw your previous comment saying they arenāt. They are routinely used in media and in court cases. What sort of two bit shop operation do you think RTE are. They are the state broadcasters with huge resources. Do you think theyāve never had to investigate or verify a screenshot before? Just how fucking naive and stupid are you? Seriously?
See here is your fabled ignorance excuse, if you are now feigning ignorance then why the fuck are you on here defending and arguing something you are claiming complete ignorance about.
You are an absolute simpleton. Go jizz over Messi.
1 Like
Screenshot are absolutely not proof on their own. Anyone can edit a screenshot. They are used in court cases when the information has been verified as it is the easiest way to bring the information to court
Screenshots arenāt proof. Iāve heard it wll now.
Listen youāve changed your tune.
They are proof, you are now engaging in mental gymnastics to state otherwise but are too stupid to raise any sort of reasonable argument to back that up. A screenshot is evidence in its own, these were genuine screenshots from a named source but RTE failed to report on it.
Itās unreal. Itās up there with the most idiotic things youāll ever read on here.
Oooft. Heāll need to rebrand. Again.
You donāt learn that on the forklift I suppose
Maybe you should tell this judge she got it wrong you complete fruitcake.
Thisāll drive the boys mad. Go easy ffs.
Apologies mate, can you confirm if you wrote this?
