Yes.
A screenshot is proof. They had a named source and the screenshots are genuine, none of the accused parties have questioned their veracity.
Yes.
A screenshot is proof. They had a named source and the screenshots are genuine, none of the accused parties have questioned their veracity.
Looks like @the_man_himself has gone back into hiding.
Anyway.
Screenshots are not proof mate. It is incredibly easy to edit a screenshot.
And RTE reported on them when Leo was questioned and didnât deny them
The stupidity is strong in that fella
Youâre talking out of your hole again. Screenshots are proof, they are regularly used in courts of law - nevermind media, you docile fuckwit. Stop talking out your arse about things you donât have the slightest clue about
So shut the fuck up talking absolutely ridiculous bollocks.
I think you have that worded incorrectly, they didnât report on the story until 8/9 hours after Varadkarâs spin team released a statement. Youâve self-defeated your argument here on the reasoning behind it.
Screenshots are not proof on their own mate. Screenshots can be edited incredibly easily. A screenshot which is taken for a court case will have been verified for accuracy before it gets to court.
I donât follow RTE as much as you mate, I couldnât tell you how many hours late they were. They have reported on the matter all week since
This is getting unseemly now
You have completely changed your tune now.
Screenshots are proof, simple as that so you should withdraw your previous comment saying they arenât. They are routinely used in media and in court cases. What sort of two bit shop operation do you think RTE are. They are the state broadcasters with huge resources. Do you think theyâve never had to investigate or verify a screenshot before? Just how fucking naive and stupid are you? Seriously?
See here is your fabled ignorance excuse, if you are now feigning ignorance then why the fuck are you on here defending and arguing something you are claiming complete ignorance about.
You are an absolute simpleton. Go jizz over Messi.
Screenshot are absolutely not proof on their own. Anyone can edit a screenshot. They are used in court cases when the information has been verified as it is the easiest way to bring the information to court
Screenshots arenât proof. Iâve heard it wll now.
Listen youâve changed your tune.
A screenshot is proof
Not proof
Screenshots are not proof mate. It is incredibly easy to edit a screenshot.
They are proof, you are now engaging in mental gymnastics to state otherwise but are too stupid to raise any sort of reasonable argument to back that up. A screenshot is evidence in its own, these were genuine screenshots from a named source but RTE failed to report on it.
Screenshots arenât proof. Iâve heard it wll now.
Itâs unreal. Itâs up there with the most idiotic things youâll ever read on here.
Oooft. Heâll need to rebrand. Again.
You donât learn that on the forklift I suppose
Maybe you should tell this judge she got it wrong you complete fruitcake.

Ten people have been accused of illegally sharing pictures or names of Ana KriĂŠgelâs teenage murderers on Facebook and Twitter.
Thisâll drive the boys mad. Go easy ffs.
Youâre talking out your hole as usual.
We can never have any proof anymore because it could be fake is your contention.