Iād say once the contact isnt swinging a hurl across a lads head you can work away.
The Leix crowd now lecturing on safety on the hurling field. Tis no wonder ye are gone to fuck
We are always fuck. But donāt try change the subject. He struck a man off the ball with his hurl across the head. Maybe own one or two things every now and then.
Weāve no issue with his suspension sure. Will the fella who started the row and hit him in the balls get the same treatment?
Would that involve a level of personal responsibility?
Sadly yes.
Itās fucked so
Coulda fooled me

Itās fucked so
So it seems

Coulda fooled me
Easily done sure
The Sow will be rolled out soon on some broadcasting station to excuse sinned against Willās actions
More deflection because thereās no arguing with the suspension

The Sow will be rolled out soon on some broadcasting station to excuse sinned against Willās actions
But but but look over there

More deflection because thereās no arguing with the suspension
Whoās arguing with it?
You made a pigs ear of that post.
No issues except telling lies about it, so it would seem.

Will o donoghue being given a one match ban is a fuckin jokeā¦
Tynan shouldnāt have flicked WOD across mid riff but it was harmless compared to WODās strike.
Obviously Will deserves the suspension, although I wouldnāt call it a āstrikeā. He pushed the hurley into his face rather than delivering an absolute strike. Itās a small difference but a lot less painful.
Who really cares if he misses a league game? Heāll take his punishment and weāll move on, no point whinging about it.
The issue about selective post-match justice is a different one but one that seems to rear its head after all of these type of issues. There is no āciting commissionerā like in rugby; do they just look at what was replayed on the TV coverage and base it on that? Obviously this particular incident wasnāt mentioned on League Sunday so they canāt be blamed this time.
I suppose the inconsistency is the potential annoyance for managers. Particularly combined with the rule that if the referee ādealsā with the issue and makes a complete hames of it, thereās no additional consequences (for example, what Damien Cahalane did in the Kilkenny match was way worse than anything that happened in the melee).

Obviously Will deserves the suspension, although I wouldnāt call it a āstrikeā. He pushed the hurley into his face rather than delivering an absolute strike. Itās a small difference but a lot less painful.
Who really cares if he misses a league game? Heāll take his punishment and weāll move on, no point whinging about it.
The issue about selective post-match justice is a different one but one that seems to rear its head after all of these type of issues. There is no āciting commissionerā like in rugby; do they just look at what was replayed on the TV coverage and base it on that? Obviously this particular incident wasnāt mentioned on League Sunday so they canāt be blamed this time.
I suppose the inconsistency is the potential annoyance for managers. Particularly combined with the rule that if the referee ādealsā with the issue and makes a complete hames of it, thereās no additional consequences (for example, what Damien Cahalane did in the Kilkenny match was way worse than anything that happened in the melee).
The Dow seems well able to pick up on infringements involving other counties yet totally ignored WOD last week.