Weāll win the Champions League pal
Book marked
You have to back yourself on here or you will be eaten alive.
Nonsense. Rodgers was backed but couldnāt attract the best players. He admitted himself he got Gerrard to chat to potential signings. Sanchez went to Arsenal instead of Liverpool because of London. Heās happy to move north now. Klopp on the other hand has been able to attract VVD and Ox ahead of Chelsea and City and Keita is a big coup also.
How long was he managing United before he won silverware?
Bit rich from an arsenal fan. Hows the Europa league?
Come again.
Throw up some outlandish claims Iāve made recently in relation to AFC, pal.
Huh? Just pointing out that arsenal have no skin in the CL
Reads like waffle, pal.
What best players has Klopp attracted?
By and large they have been relatively unproven players who he has paid a premium for.
Sanchez is happy to move Northy because City will pay him 400k a week.
VVD and Ox are unproven at the highest level, likewise Keita.
Will you have some respect for yourself for the love of god
KOKs 12 months ago (on Liverpool being off the pace) - āThe reason Liverpool canāt compete is because they canāt sign the top players and compete financially with the likes of City, United, Arsenal and Chelsea.ā
KOKs today (on Liverpool being off the pace) - āKlopp is doing an unreal job as he is able to get in top class playersā
How long was Ferguson managing United before he won silverware?
What best players has Klopp attracted?
By and large they have been relatively unproven players who he has paid a premium for.
Sanchez is happy to move Northy because City will pay him 400k a week.
VVD and Ox are unproven at the highest level, likewise Keita.
Since Benitez left Liverpool have been unable to attract players that were coveted by the likes of Chelsea, Man Utd and City. Chelsea wanted Ox, Chelsea and City wanted Van Dijk. They both chose Liverpool because of Klopp. Sanchez chose Arsenal ahead of Liverpool. All things being equal would he make the same choice now?
Sanchez chose Arsenal ahead of Liverpool. All things being equal would he make the same choice now?
Christ on a bike.
The reason āOxā moved was apparently down to Chelsea seeing him as a wing back and Liverpool promising using him as a central midfielder. Van Dijk didnāt move to City or Chelsea because they didnāt want him that much. The difference between this now is that the board are really backing their manager and Klopp is very lucky to have that kind of faith and trust behind him, Iām not sure itās at all merited though.
Would Sanchez make the same choice now?
Why wouldnāt he? Heās not moving to Liverpool now. It looks like heāll be off to one of the two richest clubs in Europe at present (PSG or City) and if itās City he will likely become the highest paid player in the league.
Christ on a bike.
Apart from the merits of the Skoda shitcan on bog roads in Tipperary you know fuck all. Head off to the āask harryā thread like a good lad.
Is that it, mate.
Hindsight & waffleā¦
The reason āOxā moved was apparently down to Chelsea seeing him as a wing back and Liverpool promising using him as a central midfielder. Van Dijk didnāt move to City or Chelsea because they didnāt want him that much. The difference between this now is that the board are really backing their manager and Klopp is very lucky to have that kind of faith and trust behind him, Iām not sure itās at all merited though.
Irrelevant, Liverpool managed to get two players that were wanted by Chelsea and Man City, something that would have been unheard of during Rodgers era. If Liverpool and Arsenal and were to go for the same player in this transfer window it is likely that they would choose Liverpool and that is partly down to Klopp and partly down to the shambles that Wenger has turned Arsenal in to.
Is that it, mate.
Hindsight & waffleā¦
Yep Iāve stooped to your level in the hope you get the hint.