You do realise I put up my opinion ever before you posted yours ?
1 Like
Pathetic in nth degree…
I am sure this spectacle is amusing a lot of people. I am really not so interesting.
Next up: how Colin Lynch was an awful hurler.
Terribly badly rattled.
Almost a seethe.
Yes. In the apartment, as I noted.
Did the dogs know the McCanns had stayed in the apartment? If someone told them then it wasn’t an impartial bark.
5 Likes
What sad bedfellows an obsession with getting my attention makes…
You now have a lad snuggling up to a lad whom he accused of pretending to be him on Twitter, so as to frame him for doxxing other people (including me).
Pathetic and really quite weird.
There are a lot of right oddballs on here.
This clown forgot to mention whiskey. I am so in a rage about whiskey not being mentioned.
And this clown, not too long ago, was sending me dms to try and get my attention.
People watching must be most amused.
I think people are just amused when somebody falls down a conspiracy rabbit hole in plain sight.
Because it is amusing.
Same dog from the McCann case….
Anybody that is hanging their hats on these dogs is wrong.
The dogs have been misleading plenty of times and even how they were used in this case raises Question marks.
The he said she said stuff and their behaviour is all quite subjective and mainly points to the opinion that they are oddballs.
The fact that they are willing to leave their kids as exposed as that is testament to the fact that they are selfish cunts and more likely to cover up her death to maintain their own lifestyle. We’ve all seen instances where children have died at the hands of their disadvantaged parents. It somehow seems harder to imagine that this could happen in upper middle class families.
The input from cadaver dogs is the most interesting piece of evidence but I’m still on the fence
There was a big disinformation campaign put out when the penny dropped that the cadaver dog evidence was none too easy to dismiss. Yer man is simply googling around and making himself a dupe of that campaign.
The undeniable fact is that the British government showed a disproportionate level of interest in this case at the time. I have no idea why (although conspiracy theories naturally abound). I am only interested in the mismatch of details in this case with the abduction thesis. The McCanns’ preoccupation with the shutters in their apartment from early in the week is another anomaly.
Yes, absolutely seriously. They have been dangling this for months and months, on the basis of what sounds like a jailhouse snitch. They appear to have zero hard evidence, none. So, I think they are on sketchy ground, yes, and if what I read is correct, his current jail term is about up, so he’s near enough to being released.
Why, what do you think? Why are you so convinced he’s the culprit?
Enlighten me.
A lot of wise words there.
I am a pragmatist and I simply ask myself why parents would be focused on cleaning their phone of data when their three year old has supposedly just been abducted.
The devil is in the detail. The McCanns’ use of language also damned them.
Madeline was in a kids club on the day of the abduction while the parents played tennis.
Again You are wrong here.
I struggle with the arrogance dripping off yours 
I should say: ‘Stop making a fool of yourself.’
I do not say it.
Sure you’ve just been caught spouting rubbish. She was alive on the day of the disappearance.
You are spoofing and now you are caught out you just try and insult people.
It’s bizarre.
I never said I believed he was the culprit.
But you seem to believe that it’s plausible that authorities in Germany somehow decided that a dangerous person was about to leave prison and so conspired to pin a high profile crime from years ago on him. I don’t believe that’s likely, I think it’s close to impossible.
1 Like