There is no questioning Rooneyâs commitment and work rate. Like all good strikers he is streaky and can go off the boil. He has definitely lost a half yard of pace and his confidence has been low. A goal can change all that, especially one well despatched like tonight. I canât understand why Martial is not up top with Rooney at 10 instead of the bollix of playing Rooney at 9 and 10. Itâs either Mata or Rooney at 10 not both. The problem is no decent wingers which the club has always had. The available wingers are shite which is why Martial and Mata are being played out wide. If van Gaal had any balls he would play one defensive mid rather than two and set up more aggressive. He wonât though the orange Cunt.
The rate of success either side of the advent of Sky tv money and the EPL in season 1992/93 tells a different tale.
Just 7 league titles in the 90 years from their foundation in 1902 up to season 1992/93, then 13 league titles in the first 20 years of the Sky/EPL era up to 2013.
1902 was the year of foundation of Man U, not 1878.
Claiming that Man U were founded in 1878 is just silly. Its like a supporter of the newest club in the Scottish league Glasgow Rangers claiming they were founded in 1872.
Strange to be having centenary celebrations in 1978 when they were only around for 76 years. Do they operate the now defunct old Roman Calendar instead of the Julian Calendar at Old Trafford?
Like a lot of Manchester United fans you seem to be very insecure about Manchester Unitedâs johnny come lately status in the hierarchy of football tradition. Its the only logical explanation for this re-invention of history. If it makes you feel any better, Chelsea were founded three yearâs later than Manchester United in 1905.
Iâm not insecure at all buddy, the crest above doesnât lie. I just canât abide someone being wrong on the INTERNET.
I wouldnât deem 1878 as johnny come lately either, although I suppose when compared to grass roots regional football teams such as Notts County it could be deemed so.
Making up a history that doesnât exist. Thatâs the essence of insecurity. Newton Heath Football Club was founded in 1878 and was served with a winding up order in 1902 after getting into financial difficulty.
There was no Manchester United Football Club before 1902.
I understand you to be claiming that Manchester United was founded in 1878 on the basis that there was a football club in the Manchester area Newton Heath operating in that period. Weak.
Like Marathon changed to Snickers and Opal Fruits to Starburst, Newton Heath rebranded to Manchester United when a group of local business men stepped in and cleared their debt. The UEFA website lists Manchester United year of formation as 1878. The club celebrated its centenary in 1978.
No amount of googling or obfuscation will alter the facts pal.
There was me thinking that rebranding & marketing men were a creation of the Sky Sports/EPL post 1992 era. Manchester United (or should that be Newton Heath) were rebranding a full 90 years earlier in 1902.