I hope thatâs an alopecia reference about Jackman and not a reference to him being in the running for the job?
he had called it a good while back.
Believe some guy who was close to rowntree was sounded as well as the director of rugby but I presume heâs not coming now.
What youâre saying makes absolutely no sense, can you give the reason for delaying the announcement if indeed it was decided as long back you say?
I presume they wanted to announce the whole management team together to create a bit of a splash.
Not uncommon in rugby tbf. A lot of player contracts are sorted in the summer but they wait till November to announce it.
Thatâs complete bullshit in fairness to you.
Sure listen loads of people had it in January but you want to be in denial over it for some reasonâŚ
I merely noted that youâre talking complete bullshit.
If what you say is true whatâs the reasoning for withholding the announcement? Because the reason you gave is utterly stupid. Withholding the announcement makes no sense.
Why ? He isnât going to be the head guy. Heâs replacing larkham more than van graan.
The director of rugby they were after had close ties to rowntree. Obviously this has fallen through.
If you followed Munster at all youâd see over the last decade how often they announce contract renewals together but of course instead you just scream bullshit.
Iâm still not seeing any sense in withholding the announcement. You seem to be claiming it was solely for PR purposes. Thatâs laughable.
Iâm not saying that.
Iâm saying there was another name on the ticket which obviously fell through.
A lad who worked with rowntree with Georgia. The name escapes me.
Itâs a shambles heâs nobody else with him and we are in April.
You said they didnât announce Rowntree because they wanted to announce the full team together. That really doesnât make sense in any way at all. It would have been better for the team and everyone involved to announce Rowntree earlier, if indeed the decision had been made.
You must never follow these announcementsâŚ
You canât give any reasoning for the decision youâre saying they made to withhold the announcement. The only conclusion is that youâve fallen for some fella down the pub saying I told ye that ages ago or that youâre just talking through your hole.
You are such simpleton I donât even no why I entered this discussion in the first place.
Itâs clear there was meant to be a replacement for van gran on the ticket. Obviously this deal has fallen through hence the wait.
If you canât understand this Iâm wasting my time.
You may well be correct that they hoped to announce another name as well. You havenât explained why that would mean that they should withhold the Rowntree announcement. You said it was for PR purposes to announce both names together. Thatâs daft.
It was known for an age the guy from wasps was signing but no announcement.
Same with the bok Centre leaving.
Itâs very common these things are delayed for what ever reason.
Ok. No reasoning at all.
Milton haig
Bingo
A hape of English rejects and a Georgian nobody.
The Irish coaching succession programme needs a bit of work