I have drink on me, but I think I can probably articulate it better this way. In all seriousness, hereās what I think was justified:
The formation of the Provisional IRA in 1969/70, due to the burning of Catholics (the conflict was sectarian as far as Unionists were concerned, not as far as Catholic/Nationalists were concerned, sectarianism has generally been a one way street in BOI) out of their homes and the total impotence of the Official IRA in defending their community. The Short Strand Riots of June 1970 brought this to a head. The āwarā escalated in increments.
After internment in January 1971, the British Army and the British state effectively declared war against the Catholic/Nationalist community, reinforcing the already existing apartheid against the Catholic/Nationalist community.
Bloody Sunday heightened the conflict to a new level - after that there was no doubt that the British state was at war against the Catholic/Nationalist community. If you are under siege, you fight back. This is the same reason why, say Hamas or Hizbollah exist. Fighting back in these circumstances is entirely legitimate.
With the obvious collusion between the RUC/B Specials/UVF/UDA/UFF etc it became even more clear that the Catholic/Nationalist community was the victim of a sectarian war. It is entirely understandable that members of the āCrown Forcesā became targets n these circumstances.
What is not acceptable is sectarian killings. Tragically this did occur and it is arguable that the PIRA/other groupings such as the INLA etc to some extent became a magnet for scumbags eg Seamus Twomey who was behind the Kingsmills massacre which was sectarian. There were other atrocities such as this eg Darkley and La Mon, Enniskillen etc. These are to be unreservedly condemned. In my view the PIRA campaign lost its focus and lost its way as the years went on. This does not make the aim of the struggle and the actions of the majority of the volunteers anything less than entirely justified. The actions of the hunger strikers remain unimpeachable.
Crown forces remained legitimate targets through the troubles as far as Iām concerned. While I have sympathy for the British soldiers who were caught up in the war, they represented an imperial colonial oppressing force, because letās face it - thatās what the six counties is - an imperial colony. I have total sympathy for 18/19 year old lads who were involved in something they did no understand at all.
Context is key. The Catholic/Nationalist community for many years was brutalised and subject to an apartheid regime. Like anywhere in the world, they decided theyād had enough. Iād emphasise the words apartheid and brutalised again, just to ram the point home.
"John F. Kennedy had a good quote - āThose who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.ā This is entrely applicable to the North of Ireland.
As for Omagh - if you think I supported something like that, well, I donāt know what to say mate. Even the bombers admit that they made a horrendous mistake. The whole thing was the most tragic mistake in the modern history of Ireland and it still disturbs me, as does Warrington etc, and I can still remember exactly what I was doing and where I was when I heard about it - I was out for a drive in Kinvara with my parents and my brother. I saw Mick Grimes who had his wife, daughter and grandchild killed at Omagh on Gay Byrneās last Late Late Show and Iām not ashamed to say I cried uncontrollably. In 2002 we went to Omagh on the fourth anniversary of the bomb and visited the memorial garden and Iām not ashamed to say I cried then either.
By the way I didnāt agree at all with the blowing up of Ronan Kerr - I donāt believe he should have joined the PSNI but thatās a whole different debate.
Iād just prefer if you didnāt make what I see as a cheap joke about Omagh.