The posters here who are obsessively anti-Roderick O’Gorman should be honest and state up front that they’re just fine with baselessly labelling people as paedophiles.
I’ve never heard one of them say that baselessly and consistently labelling somebody a paedophile is wrong, and all of them just sit there and giggle when it happens.
What’s the story with this Fleming chap who is tipped to get in. His social media accounts are filled with meaningless banalities which give no indication of anything he believes.
But I couldn’t help noticing he refers to himself as a small business owner which is always a warning signal that somebody is a gobshite.
You seem to have carte blanche on this forum (denying it from being a great pocket of chat for loads of people to dip in to) but if Roderick O’Gorman poses with Peter Tatchel (not sure if spelling is right - but certainly not googling it) who believes that sexual activity with minors is acceptable, and a personal cause, then I’m not sure what I, or anyone else can do for you.
There’s loads of that stuff on BlueSky I believe if that’s what floats your boat.
You’re very quick to use the word rapist and cobble together associations so be big enough to accommodate others simply doing the same.
Reckon @Rocko will be delighted with that libel being posted on his platform. Presume you’ve left your details with him for when the solicitors gets in touch?