This is an interesting Twitter thread imnvho.
2 Likes
âWe arenât coming to kill you, but to convince you. But if you donât want to be convinced, weâll kill you. Weâll kill as many as we have to: 1 million, 5 million, or exterminate all of you.â
You canât say fairer than that
These are the same âlegitimate Eastern Ukrainian concerns over ties with Russiaâ lads.
The ones with âbusinessâ with Russia, now saying theyâll commit genocide to protect it.
Yet itâs all the big bad IMF, World Back and collective âWestâ that are the problem.
Youre an absolute fanny.
Russia is the problem because theyâve invaded.
The US are a cause of war and as the world renowned authors on geopolitics have attested, they are fighting a proxy war with Russia and using Ukraine to do so - Chomsky, Parenti et al all recognise and are adamant on this if you and headbangers like Bandage and one eye joe donât want to take my word on it.
Youâve said yourself the problem is with business in the east with ties to Russia - where the imf is coming in and laying down conditions that Ukraine has to abide by , including agri land sales and GM foods been grown ,- this is a cause of discontent.
The Ukrainian people as a whole were against this but your beloved world bank pushed it and then we get an invasion not long afterâŚ
No one here is excusing anything, merely pointing out what has been going on the the region. You Neocons are only delighted to hide behind the war to dismiss your part in it.
This gibberish is troubling
7 Likes
The nickname of the new general putin appointed is general Armageddon. Sounds like a pleasant individual.
1 Like
Wanting to stop refugees fleeing war from coming here is controversial. Itâs also illegal.
Having an opinion and asking questions is illegal? I didnât say anything controversial. I havenât said anything controversial about the war.
Youâve said some controversial things.
Ethnic Russians in Ukraine donât matter and the West will bring freedom and prosperity to the East are far more controversial things to say than anything i said.
Cheerleading a war is far more controversial than anything Iâve said.
Weâre in a very strange place where somebody cheering on war and murder thinks theyâre more morally virtuous than someone advocating a peaceful outcome and exploring previous treaties and agreements.
But thats where we are i suppose.
Loads of reasonable people, experts in politics chomsky et al have similar views to me, are they controversial?
Iâm responding in good faith, i know youâll pick apart the post and find something you can try make me look bad with and you look good and ignore the rest, you just canât help yourself, like you did to start again this morning
We are required to receive refugees. Itâs illegal to to refuse to accept refugee. You want to stop refugees coming to Ireland, thatâs a controversial opinion.
Ireland has stopped accepting refugees from other countries
1991 vote for independence results
You are assuming ethnic Russians want to be in Russia. Big leap. Unless you are counting those famous referendums again
Iâd imagine after how the Russians have indiscriminately killed the people they are allegedly rescuing this would be at least as convincing now
He keeps referring to âethnic Russiansâ without saying why. I asked why but he wonât tell me. Will you ask him there and see if he tells you?
Utter gibberish, weasel words.
Sorry bud - Russia bad , everyone else good.
Thatâs the language you sheep understand?
The political landscape has shifted since 1991? How come its not controversial to go back 30 years for a political event that suits your view but not 8 that doesnât, thats terrible
A democratically elected pro russian government was overthrown
Youâre still lying.
Defending the murderer.
Tell me where the lie is there? It was an internationally recognised election
This is from 2021
Noam Chomsky is a gobdaw.