What was the alternative to what he did?
The same lads whoâll defend the IRA for kneecapping lads think that itâs fine to let paedo rapists roam the streets, as long as Gerry says so that is
What was the alternative to what he did??
Hell of a straw man youâre hiding behind there. I donât think anyone has suggested that Adams arrest a suspected Paedo.
But I suppose, in your own way, youâre refuting the entire IRA campaign of murder and violence seeing as they, in your words, didnât have the authority.
To tell the police. Do you think he was right to do nothing and allow his brother to interact with children?
So youâre telling us you think he should have gone to the RUC?
Christ you are naive.
Maybe he should have had him kneecapped instead.
Do you think he was right to do nothing and allow his brother to interact with children?
Iâm not arguing against your point⌠But what do you mean by a man of Gerryâs profile? The RUC wanted him dead and they were involved in all kinds of sectarian murders⌠The RUC were a sectarian murder machine, very few nationalists would turn to them for anything.
Iâm not excusing or defending anyone, but you havenât a notion about the North if you think nationalists at that time should have gone to the RUC ⌠It was huge that his niece actually did and then look what happened.
When did Gerry find out the truth?
1 Like
2000, he told the PSNI in 2009.
If he told the police the second he found out and they did nothing, fair enough but you canât just listen to someone admitting they have raped their own daughter and then allow them to go to youth clubs in Belfast like nothing is wrong
3 Likes
Yes. Exactly that
1 Like
Maybe he offered to?
All youâre showing is complete ignorance of what the north was and is like.
Maybe you should keep your mouth shut on matters such as this rather than make an idiot out if yourself.
1 Like
Will you answer this last question please?
Do you think he was right to do nothing and allow his brother interact with children?
I donât see what reasonable course of action you are saying he could have taken?
The only alternative you have given is go to a sectarian police involved in the murder of nationalists and subsequent cover-ups, despised by the nationalist community and who had already failed to investigate when the victim went to them in 1987?
Itâs a loaded question that does not make any sense but youâve been too busy cheerleading the RUC to look at them.
1 Like
To me, and I donât know all the ins and outs of this, is why wasnât there republican justice⌠Even in 2000, the police were still a no go.
He should have told the police and in the event of them ignoring him, he should have made sure that his brother wouldnât be in a position to hurt children again.
You know I havenât done that even once, stop deflecting
2 Likes
Well that would be preferable to doing nothing, yes. You canât just allow admitted paedophiles to live life the way they want
The police force being the RUC, already aware of the allegations, despised and not trusted by nationalists, involved in huge amounts of sectarian killings and cover-ups.
Youâre extremely naive.
So you think he was right to do nothing and allow his brother to live a care free life?
Do you think he was right to try to intimidate his niece to stop her making it public as well?
Youâre asking another loaded question that makes no sense. The only alternative you out forward just shows a complete ignorance and naivetĂŠ to those times and how the police force was distrusted with great reason in nationalist communities.
Iâd be more focused on the RUC if I was you.
Iâd also be worried that the head of the Gardai is a peeler who has tried to suppress justice for the victims of the biggest terrorist atrocity in the free state but it might not fit in with your narrative.
1 Like
