Ya not a bad idea. But has there not been huge issues in US with same?
One of tge major issues here apparently nowadays is foreign nationals refusing to speak to or recognise Bangarda. And apparently its more or less impossible to do anything about it.
The fear is claims of discrimination etc. Their hands seem to be completely tied. And its rarely stuff thats really impirtant, taxi drivers or neighbour dusputes etc. Same issues with Itinerants.
The cameras would solve some of that. But its bullshit.
Training is a major factor. A cop in Germany for example has on average close to two years further training than a cop in the US. Something like 115 weeks to 19 weeks. In some states there is no formal training programme at all. In Oklahoma you can become a cop after 20 credit hours in the academy.
Body cameras has a lot of obvious positives in helping good gardai and shutting down bad ones, but it would introduce in one move an incredible level of surveillance of the general population. I’d be very uneasy about that.
Would it though? The camera would only be capturing stuff the Garda would see anyway. It only goes where the Garda already goes. Introduces hard evidence to combine with the already strong word of Gardaí when crimes are witnessed, and could eliminate a lot of the rubbish Gardaí put up with.
It captures everything a Garda sees every day, every person on the street, every passing car registration. The volume of info is massive. How long is it going to be kept? Why? How is it going to be managed? It’s a scary level of surveillance and past experience in Ireland wouldn’t fill you with confidence it wouldn’t be abused.
Maybe microphones would do the same job without such a level of intrusion.
Good to see the commissioner has her priorities straight, civil war in Upper management and all ranks below going on strike and the commissioner is on a jolly to San Diego. The woman has been a disaster.