Interesting that youâre now linking to the same guy who said the following, given your dismissal of anti-semitism among Trump supporters:
âIâve experienced more pure, unadulterated anti-Semitism since coming out against Trumpâs candidacy than at any other time in my political career,â Shapiro wrote in May. âTrump supporters have threatened me and other Jews who hold my viewpoint. Theyâve blown up my email inbox with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. They greeted the birth of my second child by calling for me, my wife, and two children to be thrown into a gas chamber.â
I never denied there was anti semitism in the USA. Once again, this was in response to you claiming the 60 odd million Americans who voted for Trump were anti semites.
Youâve failed to put forward any statistic to back that up in months, but go on, and on about it.
No polls are done to represent the majority as every knows.
A poll that large for the entire Muslim population would be too costly to carry out for the average research groupâŚbut the numbers come back roughly the same for all of these polls. Numerous ones have been carried over the years;France and Germany too.
Polls like this arenât 100 correct ( as we seen with trump) but they are near enough⌠The polls showed Hilary leading by a few points not by much but Trump won by a small margin. Same as these polls. Those figures, if done as a mass Muslim census, would show a correlation to the smaller polls as they are done to reflect the masses. Sections are taken from young/old/rich/poor/female/male. Itâs standard for all these polls to be carried out this way otherwise the results wouldnât truly reflect the majority or results nor would they reflect similar polls by other organisations who asked the same questions in their polls.
If you want an actual figure that is unquestionable. 50â000 people in Britain downloaded an al-Qaeda terrorist magazine in 2015 that shows how to commit terrorists attacks. This wasnât over a year either; this was in the space of 3 months. The annual figure Iâd imagine was three to four times that!
So give or take a few messers who downloaded it for the craic(and Iâd imagine not many due to how serious mI5 take terrorism and the downloading of such content) and some media people and universities for research it is still a significant number. Youâre talking around 150â000 to possibly 200â000 copies of a terrorist magazine in just one year. Many of these are probably repeat down-loaders who come back each time for the new editionâŚbut none the less itâs much more than that 1%
You stated that it was hilarious that Trump supporters supported when so many were anti semites.
The only thing correct in that statement is that many Trump voters are pro Israel. This is factual, and is based on polling of Republcan voters and their attitudes to Israel.
You were unable to link this âmanyâ Trump voters to anti semitism.
Youâre so beyond a cliche at this stage that I wouldnât even bother to note if you were attempting parody. I will however dispute you making stuff up about what I posted, regardless of your âparodyâ shite.
I talked about his response, considering a couple of weeks ago it involved referencing a war that started 15 years ago. Is that âlinkingâ him to the attacks? You use disingenous language, the word link implies I was linking him to the perpetrators actions. Same as one may talk about Mayâs response. Letâs see if he uses the same naval gazing language as last time.
I steamed in, hah, look at your posts before I even commented. You have zero self-awareness.
Self-aware that Iâm a well-read, nuanced individual who is debating with a fucking moron who hasnât a clue what heâs talking about beyond the standard May/Trump/Bush neo-con response.
Self-aware that that pisses off a lot of people with less understanding than myself.
And self-aware that I throw in a few jokes that offend people, which they are meant to do.
And, like Corbyn, aware that the West has serious questions to answer in how it has behaved in the Middle East and majority-Muslim countries for decades, aware that terrorism generally doesnât come out of nowhere, and aware that any response should be measured and take cognisance of that fact.
Which you are completely unaware of.
Having that view doesnât make one an apologist for Islamist terrorism, much as you might like to paint such as.
