Reuters are not āmainstreamā now, apparently. 
The one man unintentional comedy show just keeps delivering.
For a pretend journalist, reading comprehension appears to be a weakness of yours.
Reuters is not mainstream in the US, why is that hard to comprehend?
Why do you think your beloved CNN, MSNBC, Vox, etc. are not covering the attempt to burn 51 children alive in western European country? Answer the question or kindly fuck off.
Iām working with a lad who is ex Polish military he was a top marksman and instructor, he was rabbiting on how the media constantly use ISIS this and that and they never label the terrorists Muslims, he compared it to how Italy and Germany after WW2 are referred to looking back as Fascists and Nazis rather than Germans and Italians. He described the New Zealand shootings as āa good job, clean job!ā
Yes it is pal - let it go - you dont need to humiliate yourself any more than youāve done since you first posted on this forum.
Hipster fascism is all the rage
Joe Rogan is your friendly gateway to right wing white supremacist insanity
https://twitter.com/VicBergerIV/status/1110301264657551360
Ladybird?
Slate is largely written by gimps, but this was fairly good:
Fascinating. Iāve always longed to know what Slate do with my data.
Iāve tried to post Slate articles before here, actually. None of them will link properly.
Thatās an article about Joe Roganās far-right following, donāt read it if you donāt want to.
I know. Iāve already read four paragraphs of it.
Is Joe rogan āfar rightā now? I thought he was some random middle of the road podcaster who isnāt quite as low brow as Russell Brand (@anon61878697)
Interesting article, that.
I really enjoyed this demolition of Jordan Peterson. I couldnāt help thinking of a certain poster on this forum as the preposterous worldview of Peterson was skewered.
Funnily enough, I agree with him that words can lead to, or incite, murder - but in the completely opposite way to how he thinks it does - which is obviously utterly absurd.
Flicked through that - your man seemās to do a lot of crying about what he wantās Joeās show or interviewās to be ā¦ he appears to want them to fit his world view, which is very ironicā¦ but i only skimmed it.
Thatās the modern world tho - everyone needās to dig in and consolidate their world view ā thereās no learning, people just cling to stuff that makes them appear right and dismiss everything else as complete poisonā¦ itās an awful way to live yet most of the western world are at it.
He does the opposite, mate
Accurate criticism of a show is not ācryingā - one of the problems with the modern world is reactions like yours in which you canāt take a bit of criticism without actually doing the exact thing which you mendaciously project onto others
You put a lot of thought into that - going back editing it 5 mins laterā¦ How is it criticism of me do tell? Iām no fan of Joeās, nor Peterson ā¦ Iāll engage with some of their stuff just as easily as iād engage with stuff from the left/ centre/ rightā¦ iām flexible in my views and in what I listen to/ read.
You dont have to be right all the time mate.
Youāre the only one who can answer that as you clearly feel it is
Not at all ā¦ I was tagged into this thread and as I said, I only skimmed through the article and only offered cursory findings - nothing binding.
Well at least you skimmed through it. Sid sneered at it without even reading it, then he boasted that heād already read four paragraphs - which presumably meant he was on to the last oneā¦
I read the whole article - you clearly didnāt mate