[QUOTE=âRocko, post: 1068705, member: 1â]You continue to astound me with your incredible lack of common sense. Are you seriously suggesting the entire Muslim religion was antagonized by those cartoons. I think you have a bit more reading to do Kev.
And thereâs no moral high ground debate you can win that ends up with this being somehow a lesser crime than Warrington.[/QUOTE]
No both murders, but yes those kids are more innocent than these Journalists.
The kids never had a chance to make choices, these adults did, and they put others in danger.
Thatâs the beauty of it. @The Selfish Giant once coached me on the importance of being flexible in your views. As he described it to me, âChange your mind as often as you need to, but when you change it, do it convincingly and with unbridled passion and enthusiasm.â Eoghan Harris is apparently the foremost proponent of this school of opinion flexibility.
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1068697, member: 273â]You are the dickhead now comparing a 3 year olds death to that of a grown adult who was antagonizing a whole religion.
Your faux outrage really isnât washing[/QUOTE]
A 3 year old who died in a bomb which was not intended for any civilian causalities and adequate warning was phoned in.
Or innocent civilians gunned down in cold blooded murder.
[QUOTE=âIl Bomber Destro, post: 1068712, member: 2533â]A 3 year old who died in a bomb which was not intended for any civilian causalities and adequate warning was phoned in.
Or innocent civilians gunned down in cold blooded murder.[/QUOTE]
Ah, adequate warning. At least the lads had manners.
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1068706, member: 273â]My point is itâs not as simple as getting killed for a cartoon.
And whatever their reasons, those people were playing with fire and literally had a clear warning. Brave, maybe ya, stupid, certainly considering the results.[/QUOTE]
Look Kev to make this thread more coherent, please select from one of the two contrary opinions you are currently supporting:
These people were not killed for publishing the cartoon.
These people were killed for publishing the cartoon and were playing with fire and brought their cold-blooded murder on themselves.
What youâre now suggesting, is a hybrid of the two and can be summarised as:
3. These people were not killed for publishing the cartoon but they were playing with fire for publishing the cartoon and brought their cold-blooded murder on themselves, though because they werenât killed for publishing the cartoon itâs difficult to know how they could have avoided bringing their cold-blooded murder on themselves.
There were some parts of the adequate warning that were, unfortunately, justified. There were some other parts of the adequate warning that were not justified.
[QUOTE=âRocko, post: 1068716, member: 1â]Look Kev to make this thread more coherent, please select from one of the two contrary opinions you are currently supporting:
These people were not killed for publishing the cartoon.
These people were killed for publishing the cartoon and were playing with fire and brought their cold-blooded murder on themselves.
What youâre now suggesting, is a hybrid of the two and can be summarised as:
3. These people were not killed for publishing the cartoon but they were playing with fire for publishing the cartoon and brought their cold-blooded murder on themselves, though because they werenât killed for publishing the cartoon itâs difficult to know how they could have avoided bringing their cold-blooded murder on themselves.[/QUOTE]
You fucking idiot.