Terrorism Thread. The terror of another nembo kev thread

[QUOTE=“Rocko, post: 1068705, member: 1”]You continue to astound me with your incredible lack of common sense. Are you seriously suggesting the entire Muslim religion was antagonized by those cartoons. I think you have a bit more reading to do Kev.

And there’s no moral high ground debate you can win that ends up with this being somehow a lesser crime than Warrington.[/QUOTE]
No both murders, but yes those kids are more innocent than these Journalists.
The kids never had a chance to make choices, these adults did, and they put others in danger.

That’s the beauty of it. @The Selfish Giant once coached me on the importance of being flexible in your views. As he described it to me, “Change your mind as often as you need to, but when you change it, do it convincingly and with unbridled passion and enthusiasm.” Eoghan Harris is apparently the foremost proponent of this school of opinion flexibility.

This is absolutely it.

Barstoolers at their finest. They think a hooped jersey makes them a Provo.

[QUOTE=“caoimhaoin, post: 1068697, member: 273”]You are the dickhead now comparing a 3 year olds death to that of a grown adult who was antagonizing a whole religion.
Your faux outrage really isn’t washing[/QUOTE]

A 3 year old who died in a bomb which was not intended for any civilian causalities and adequate warning was phoned in.

Or innocent civilians gunned down in cold blooded murder.

He is friends with these capitalist pigs in real life, so he has to tone it down somewhat. I understand, I can feel his moral support though.

[QUOTE=“Il Bomber Destro, post: 1068712, member: 2533”]A 3 year old who died in a bomb which was not intended for any civilian causalities and adequate warning was phoned in.

Or innocent civilians gunned down in cold blooded murder.[/QUOTE]

Ah, adequate warning. At least the lads had manners.

There was adequate warning for the authorities to safely evacuate the area and avoid any casualties.

[QUOTE=“caoimhaoin, post: 1068706, member: 273”]My point is it’s not as simple as getting killed for a cartoon.
And whatever their reasons, those people were playing with fire and literally had a clear warning. Brave, maybe ya, stupid, certainly considering the results.[/QUOTE]
Look Kev to make this thread more coherent, please select from one of the two contrary opinions you are currently supporting:

  1. These people were not killed for publishing the cartoon.
  2. These people were killed for publishing the cartoon and were playing with fire and brought their cold-blooded murder on themselves.

What you’re now suggesting, is a hybrid of the two and can be summarised as:
3. These people were not killed for publishing the cartoon but they were playing with fire for publishing the cartoon and brought their cold-blooded murder on themselves, though because they weren’t killed for publishing the cartoon it’s difficult to know how they could have avoided bringing their cold-blooded murder on themselves.

Kev really doesn’t do nuance.

There were some parts of the adequate warning that were, unfortunately, justified. There were some other parts of the adequate warning that were not justified.

Do you think it’s impossible to distinguish between different acts carried out by the IRA?

Can’t be arsed posting all these up here but some cool cartoons in response to today’s events.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/heartbreaking-cartoons-from-artists-in-response-to-the-ch?bffb&utm_term=4ldqpgp&s=mobile#4ldqpgp

14 pages in, has it tickled your fancy yet @Bandage?

Of course, they weren’t always the same operation for starters.

But probably ok in Australia.

[QUOTE=“Rocko, post: 1068716, member: 1”]Look Kev to make this thread more coherent, please select from one of the two contrary opinions you are currently supporting:

  1. These people were not killed for publishing the cartoon.
  2. These people were killed for publishing the cartoon and were playing with fire and brought their cold-blooded murder on themselves.

What you’re now suggesting, is a hybrid of the two and can be summarised as:
3. These people were not killed for publishing the cartoon but they were playing with fire for publishing the cartoon and brought their cold-blooded murder on themselves, though because they weren’t killed for publishing the cartoon it’s difficult to know how they could have avoided bringing their cold-blooded murder on themselves.[/QUOTE]
You fucking idiot.

You’re taking this way too seriously.

Or Belfast

Yes but the context of a terrorist struggle is the same as what we witnessed today, you are in denial here

[QUOTE=“Mac, post: 1068723, member: 109”]Can’t be arsed posting all these up here but some cool cartoons in response to today’s events.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/heartbreaking-cartoons-from-artists-in-response-to-the-ch?bffb&utm_term=4ldqpgp&s=mobile#4ldqpgp[/QUOTE]
Some excellent ones in there.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6wZOY8CMAA_b6v.jpg:large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6wcXWdIgAA_Lbr.jpg:large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6wLaAuCIAAFTPv.jpg:large