Hasnât reared itâs head in Ireland til now really. Wait til itâs a rapist or murderer and see how irrelevant it is then.
Political and economic pressure wont work, it will be ignored and people will die and countless decent muslims brainwashed by teachings funded from there. Do you think sadaam should have been left in power?
Lads, this thread is getting very confusing. Can ye not keep it simple⌠which of ye are the ISIS lovers, and who are the Muslim haters?
Scary times. The muslim terrorists are spoiling things for the rest of us.
Yes, Saddam should have been left in power, because the alternative, manufacturing a reason to invade, which is exactly what you want to do with Saudi Arabia, predictably proved to be far worse than leaving him there.
All that reading of Chomsky, Pilger and Fisk you claim youâve done would appear to have been entirely lost on you, given that your views are far more similar to some US-style ultra-hawk.
Of course in reality, there is no chance whatsoever of the US either invading Saudi Arabia or putting any sort of political or economic pressure on it. The former is just some weird fantasy you have in your head which you havenât even begun to think through the consequences of.
2 Likes
So someone who gassed his own citizens, imprisoned and executed others on a whim, should have been left in power. You are a joke. And im a fantasist? Tell me about the trip to Australia again there
All joking aside Sidney what do you think should be done?
And he was being supported by the US when he gassed them. Who also at the same time were covertly selling arms to Iran, who Hussein was at war with.
Look, you clearly donât know very much about this sort of thing. Thereâs no shame in it. But donât think that youâre going to be taken seriously if you do then comment.
Thatâs as kind and as non-condescending as I can be towards you and your views.
1 Like
No no lets just clarify, sadaam gassed kurdish kids to death, youâre ok with this. And this somehow relates to selling arms to iran?? Keep going this is brilliant
About the alleged jihadist in Ireland or about Saudi Arabia?
Iâll just quote this as a testament to your stupidity.
What do you think the world should do about isis, refugees Syria etc.? Youâre great on what shouldnât be done. Any ideas on what might be done to improve the situation?
thats what sadaam was doing, the sanctions and pressure you think would have helped didnât affect him in the slightest, caused multiple deaths through lack or services for ordinary people, but when they didnât work, well too bad at least they tried as far as your concerned, rule away there sadaam.
He doesnât have any ideas, are you joking asking him? His idea for combating a despot like sadaam wasâŚto do nothing, oh sorry political pressure, that always works on meglomaniacs. Heâs had a shocker of a year, his posts have got stranger and stranger as he gets more desperate trying to be funny, I think heâs hitched his wagon to the PC brigade to at least be able take the moral high ground. Itâs backfired terribly.
I already wrote most of this on the Trump thread.
i) Existing laws are used to curb any hate speech in Ireland and othe European countries, better co-operation with moderate Muslim leaders such as Muhammad Umar al-Qadri.
ii) If existing laws in Ireland are shown to be inadequate to deal with Islamic fundamentalism that the Special Criminal Court be used to detain any such people
ii) Increase spending on counter-terrorism intelligence and increase co-operation between countries.
iv) Impose economic sanctions on those who trade with ISIS, ie. âour gallant alliesâ Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.
v) âGallant allyâ Turkey stops bombing the Kurds.
vi) Europe gets serious about dealing with the refugee problem and comes up with a co-ordinated plan to spend the burden of settling refugees.
Saddam gassed the Kurds in 1988 at a time when he was supported by your beloved US. He didnât gas anyone after sanctions had been imposed.
So Iâm right and youâre wrong.
Perhaps the US should have imposed sanctions upon itself for supporting him?
1 Like
Cold analysis of living conditions and deaths pre and post Sadam suggest he should indeed have been left in power , or at least the west should not have got involved in any way.
The bush/Blair alliance has resulted in rivers of blood, to use a somewhat apt metaphor.
3 Likes
Do you post on Breitbart, by any chance?
Some posters there come across as quite sane compared to you.
Are you frothing at the mouth as you type? Because one gets the impression you are.
1 Like
We have plenty of our own homegrown Enoch Powells on this thread.
I donât agree, they should have divided the country after invading it, created a Kurdish state and split the sunni and shia regions. Of course this would have meant a possible expansion of Iran into oil rich areas if a region allowed itself to be annexed by them, so the US would never have contemplated it. Again the US enter a conflict where the public and soldiers on the ground have good intentions, the policy makers driven by pure greed.
what the fuck is breitbart? no not frothing at the mouth, Iâm laughing at your attempts to be condescending. Iâm not googling breitbart but i guess you are calling me a nazi, like you called me a US hawk when I think america has had an entirely negative affect with their policy. Call me a few more names there or watch closely for spelling mistakes, your real trump card.