The displacement for rebuilds is obviously going to be a serious issue. Where will these people stay? Everyone looking to move out of the family home at the same time for the same reason and no properties available to stay in?
Absolute clusterfuck.
I put forward balanced criticisms of the government, including on Covid, as you well know.
Iâm not sure what the Big Business angle you are taking here. 100% redress and the State just taking the cost is in actual fact letting off businesses.
But I donât think you have really thought any of this true and are just looking for a narrative to make yourself feel better.
They arenât looking for excess compensation, they are looking for fair terms for being fucked over in their own homes.
Displacement, stress, issues with schooling, all sorts of ancillary issues arising from this.
Itâs grand though. Hereâs a few bob for ye
If things were right they could take this to a court of law and get millions per family. Lives are destroyed.
Comparing this to people who chose to invest excess money is very callous. These people invested in homes to raise their family and have been criminalized.
1 Like
Iâm already worried about this. Young 'fella starting primary school next September and we not be able to a house to rent within 40km of the school at some point.
1 Like
Iâd imagine any private landlord with a non-MICA impacted house in Donegal can charge whatever they like in the near future.
1 Like
Who is protecting the corporations through law in this state? Why canât those responsible be held accountable. FF/G and big business. Hand in hand.
Are these all family homes though?
Plenty of holiday homes in Donegal, lots of Air BnBs, essentially investment properties. Will they all be covered by the redress scheme as well?
No they havenât been included in the scheme to date.
should they be?
No the redress scheme has always referred to the âprimary family residenceâ.
2 Likes
building costs maybe, if there is somewhere else to live or a primary residence they should be capped at the rebuild cost, not the cost for alternative living arrangements.
âExcess moneyâ - wrong.
Do you invest in your retirement? Is that excess money? No it is not.
It wasnât just pensioners either by the way, you had 20 somethings with bank shares holding them until they could afford a house deposit.
This fella was all just about âexcess moneyâ
What I simply pointed out here was that, in his attempt to put his case above others, croppy put a hierarchy in place and dismissing others. You are trying the same now, as I assume it has got into your brain that the State cannot provide 100% guarantees for everything we put our money into. Itâs fairly pathetic when it comes down to it that is the level you get to. You have to dismiss the plight of others to buttress your argument.
Again, nobody has an issue with a level of redress. You previously made a factually incorrect statement on that with regards to me.
If the state donât want to pony up they should go after those responsible and get accountability from these crooks. But no, theyâll look to stiff the regular man and keep the noses in the trough
thatâs some strawman in fairness to you.
This is an absolute fabrication you lying cunt. You didnât even tag me here in the hope it would slip by unnoticed.
It isnât a straw man.
You claimed putting money in bank shares was âexcessâ.
I responded. Stand over your argument or donât.
To be fair the State are going to attempt to chase them up but the cunts have new companies created and the old one are worth next to nothing allegedly,.
It is a straw man. Youâre claiming Iâm belittling other people when in reality youâre the one belittling people that have had their lives ruined for no good reason other than to play the FF/G and corporate shill.
Youâve thrown out a few tropes to make it look like that isnât the case, but it is and you know it.
Youâre some man for the hyperbole.
2 Likes