I did say that. One thing Iâd agree with you on the LC, itâs clearly failing people given your lack of reading comprehension.
sure thatâs as vague as fuck. Do you read horoscopes too?
You could claim anything back with that belter.
The same thing they talked about them on with regards to the pandemic and loans. The banks should have to work with all those impacted who have mortgages still.
and when the banks tell the government to get fucked? Have the government the power to step in and force the banks to pause.
Whoâs to say the banks havenât sold the mortgages to investment funds? Thatâs a thing now
I already did. I said the banks should be made to work with mortgage owners during the period.
I agree with redress. I donât agree with 100% redress on McMansions.
now whoâs belittling. Wow.
youâve used an outlier posted by a shit stirrer as the prop for your argument
thatâs a 200k house in Letterkenny - 156m2 - thatâs reality
Theyâre looking for the value of the rebuild and ancillary costs.
The cost of building a house has sky rocketed recently too, by the way.
Work with them how? That would be a minimum additional cost of âŹ40,000 on a house that was already purchased. Much more likely that it would be closer to âŹ60k.
What could the banks do to solve this?
Thatâs for the Government to work with them on. Given the State owns large stakes in the banks, it costs us either way.
All of this is in my posts. I simply disagree with a blank cheque for redress. Iâm not sure whatâs so challenging for you. Have you got anything else left in your locker?
Why canât the people responsible be held accountable and then the state wonât have to pony up? Why are the state willing to protect them by not having a class action?
Nobody wants a blank cheque. They want very fair money for displacement and costs associated with your family home being inhabitable
Iâve already posted the factual costs of rebuild from here.
The scheme as proposed is more than sufficient for what you just posted.
Anything else from ya this afternoon?
Sure theyâd get full redress in the case of that house
The scheme as proposed is more than sufficient to rebuild homes. Some of them should go lower spec if their houses were mansions.
The costs of displacement and mortgages should be worked through with the banks.
what? why wonât anybody be prosecuted, why wonât the state go after those responsible. Why donât you want accountability ? Youâve avoided this question a good few times, which is telling
I said that we the State should be pursuing people. Again I direct you to this post. This is the third time for you.
It isnât. Youâre not getting this. Youâre ignoring ancillary costs are are acting like itâs simply a case of magically replacing the blocks with the shake a magic wand.
Ok Dorothy. Iâm a Sagittarius
Iâm not. I said the banks should be made to work through things like mortgage costs when people are displaced.
you also said people should be forced to scale down if their house costs more than the redress. Wow
Why would you still pay the mortgage on the house at this stage, itâs never going to be repossessed
Yeah they should. There has to be a limit to be a limit for that.