The Daily Debate 24-03-2020 - Zlatan or Larsson?

Since @Big_Mick_McCarthy is enjoying his life in the sun I’ll give one a rattle

Who was better, Henrick or Zlatan?

  • Zlatan
  • Larrson

0 voters

At least throw up a poll, you useless sack of shite.

1 Like

what?

You’re welcome.

That’s a very tough one.

Larson was extremely underrated for me. He wasted his career a little but there’s a lot of spoof around zatlan. He never really done it in Europe and he played for the best teams.

This is a good one though. Well done @Thomas_Brady

big game and you need a goal… Which one would deliver?

Zlatan for me.

2 Likes

Lads, it’s easily Zlatan. I’d imagine the sentimental vote will keep it close.

5 Likes

Larsson.

Zatlan failed so many times. Inter, ac, juve and Barcelona.

Senior career*
Years Team Apps (Gls)
2004–2006 Juventus 70 (23)
2006–2009 Inter Milan 88 (57)
2009–2011 Barcelona 29 (16)

He won 7 titles at those 4 clubs.

Yeah but he never did it in the last 10 minutes of close games

2 Likes

Zlatan’s carry on with regard to Tyrone Mings stamping on his head were the actions of a proper man.

No rolling around, just did him with an elbow in the next challenge.

2 Likes
1 Like

Me too — Zlatan was a bit of a flat track bully who could occasionally do something outrageous … Larsson was a winner.

1 Like

They’d have won titles without him though. He never done it in Europe. Barcelona were much better without him and when he left inter they won a treble the following season. Zatlan is a YouTube footballer in reality. He’s brilliant against the weaker teams but in the really big games champions league semi finals and that sort of thing he was an absolute failure. I think zatlan was a myth for the most part created by his own bull shit. He was good but no where near an elite level striker.

:laughing: Clueless