Well, you are really letting down yourself, there. You appear to have a rather dubious attitude towards women. But so be it.
Graham Dwyer is as guilty as sin and thankfully the horrible inadequate psychopathic creep got spooned into chokey â pun intended. Delightful that he had Tom Humphries as a white collar pal.
The detective work that snared GD must count as probably the finest ever investigation in the history of the state. Frightening aspect? Twofold: if the summer of 2013 had not been so extraordinarily dry as to empty reservoirs; if GD had thought of travelling over to Liverpool on a ferry as a foot passenger and thrown the evidence later found in a reservoir into the Irish Sea.
You have a rather corrugated mind â and should, when on the topic of women and sex, think 20 times before speaking.
Part of the reason so many women were smitten, however temporarily and in whatever degree, was because I am the sort of heterosexual who actually likes women. Many heterosexuals do not particularly like women.
Complete strawman. I never said O Dwyer wasnât guilty. I said there was no forensic evidence. You stretched things to include phone records etc, but there was no forensic evidence at the crime scene.
I was not bragging. I was simply shutting up a fooleen from Wexford.
I use a shotgun for pheasants but a .22 for the Wexford rabbit. And, really, for ease of preparation and culinary satisfaction, any rabbit needs to be headshot.
You do not understand the law. Phone data was forensic evidence. The question about that data was not its efficacy but its admissibility. And the idea that forensic evidence is confined to a âcrime sceneâ (by which you erroneously mean âwhere the remains were foundâ) is for the dizzy birds. A single murder could involve multiple crime scenes â as happened recently when that young thug got dismembered in Drogheda.
I think Dwyer case is due before European Court of Justice on Friday this week. Based on precedent heâd be looking at a retrial but Iâd suggest theyâll find a way to fudge it.
If they donât he has a strong argument of no jury being unprejudiced against him but again theyâll find a way to arrange a retrial.