No alibi, scratches on his hands and face, burning stuff on Stephenās Day, knew the victim, raging alcoholic with a history of attacking women. The Gardaiās behaviour likely got him off. He should be thanking them.
The newspaper involved claimed theyād contact with him the evening of the murder and said he hadnāt even started yet he had it submitted the following morning.
That may well be but thereās a lot of circumstantial evidence against him. What leaned me towards thinking he did it were his attempts to explain away the evidence. Not very convincing at all. The only thing going for him was Gardai incompetence.
The fact the guards pressured that Marie Farrell into changing her description initially is key.
Would the guards really have risked Leaving a killer out there just to do in Bailey? Or did the guard know something about the killing and wanted everyone
To think it was Bailey.
It makes me think the guards knew a little more than was ever let on.
The trainer killer was another theory. He able it look like a murder of passion of sorts but left not a shred of evidence behind.
A drunk Bailey is a million to one to have not left evidence imo.
Thereās enough to have him as a suspect. The Gardai fucked the case up so no one will ever know. His family think he did it which means it was likely someone local rather than some French hit man in on treble time during the Christmas. There are no other suspects.
Her marriage had broken up to a multi millionaire
Apparently he wasnāt too happy at the thoughts of her getting a few bob. Thereās s theory out there that he sent someone over to do the needy .