I thought it was shoving Connie around the green
But your hypothetical situation is a non runner. You could remove the anthem, change the rules, get rid of Irish language, whatever, and it still wonāt be enough for some who have no desire or inclination to unite. Itās playing to a gallery who have no interest.
Your probably right. But that wasnāt what I asked
Yeah but anyone who has any interest in a properly united country is going to ditch a song to get that. However ditching the song is not whatās going to get that.
Thatās what I was curious about really.
Thereās a big difference between ditching a song and ditching it to pick Phil Coulterās masterpiece. Iād gladly give away another 3 or 4 counties if it meant we never heard Irelandās Call again.
This thread is an embarrassment.
Ye are all gone PC mad.
I donāt know what the fuck is wrong with either article.
May take a side or not agree or whatever, but people would want to toughen up
Well itās brolly needs to toughen up. Heās the one got the law involved
I suppose itās like the difference between saying someone probably does a nixer or two and stating explicitly that someone is deliberately defrauding the taxman. Some fellas would Threaten legal action over that shit. Mad, I know.
You fabricate business trips online in order to diddle the tax payer on expenses.
It is. Being accused publucally of fraud is known to be very damaging
How does one make a trip online? The Internet is deeper than I thought.
You just fabricate them, mate. They donāt actually take place.
So would accusing someone of murdering people who was never convicted of that.
Thanks for the tip. After thousands upon thousands of shite youāve finally posted something useful
Eg. Iām taking a ābusiness tripā to Galway tomorrow. Iām going to be ādrivingā down and staying in a āhotelā overnight.
He is the law.
Itās well known that I fix/stock vending machines all over the country. Itās an Internet fact.
Brolly? Did he accuse Brolly of murder?