Hon ye cunts!
1 Like
Aodhan OâRiordain
What did he say?
Whats he done?
Aodhan OâRiordain
Michael Dunlop
Imelda may, cancelled
A sad day for contemporary poetry in Ireland. We still have Roy Curtis I suppose.
3 Likes
Luckily the Dubs are playing next weekend
The Dubs always inspire the Porter Laureate
1 Like
Whatâs she done?
Backed Johnny Depp i think
1 Like
Not following the trial but is the mob not piling on Amber Heard?
Making fun of her shitting habits but generally Depp is still tagged as a wife beater.
I think youâre rather underselling the right wing mobâs pile on campaign against Heard.
Seems to be no evidence for Deppâs allegation that Heard pooed in the bed, and even in the event if it were true, and it seems it isnât, would be irrelevant anyway, as the only thing that matters is whether Depp physically abused Heard, which he unquestionably did.
Reminds me of the standard GAA cliche to excuse thugs: âHe comes from a great/good/very well respected family.â
They seem to be. Not so much him being an obnoxious drunk.
I think the same but twitter have taken umbrage with her he is a nice guy comment
Around the third or fourth time I logged into Twitter to find â#AmberHeardIsAPsychopathâ at the top of the trending list, I realized that there was no longer any pretending that the Depp-Heard defamation trial was not a terrible, foreboding reflection of our cultureâs worst impulses.
The media has covered the degree to which this trial has served as a referendum on the Me Too movement and a siren call to domestic abusers.
The narrative of the trial has been shaped in part by what appears to be, according to multiple researchers, an army of bots spreading rhetoric favorable to Depp. One researcher found more bots favorable to Heard, but said most of those bots were from third-party apps trying to capitalize on the trial; meanwhile, they found the highest pro-Depp bot post was shared nearly 20,000 times. The work of those bots has been further amplified by âmenâs rights activistsâ â the part of the far-right-leaning extremist âmanosphereâ that seems to have decided discrediting Amber Heard is the key to destroying every woman who accuses men of abuse or domestic violence.
Conservative media outlets have also promoted a one-sided narrative of the case; Vice recently reported that Ben Shapiroâs popular conservative news platform the Daily Wire has spent nearly $50,000 promoting ads about the trial on Instagram and Facebook â most of it trashing Amber Heard. The presence of these bad actors has, if anything, only exacerbated the vitriol Heard has received within the mainstream.
Trial memes â almost universally weighted against Heard â have taken over every corner of the internet, from TikTok to Twitch to Etsy. Even Saturday Night Live has lampooned what have been portrayed as the many excesses and absurdities of the trial testimony, and social media users have similarly found the trial ripe for parody. On TikTok, for example, totally unrelated accounts seem to have given themselves over to full-time Depp-Heard trial mockery, to the point where the actual substance of the testimony seems completely irrelevant beside the need to mine the proceedings for entertainment. Sure, Amber Heard cried while on the stand, but did you see how ridiculous she looked while doing it?
To put it mildly, this surreal explosion of internet culture vilification of Heard feels dispiriting and troubling. What made so many millions of people feel so justified in treating such a personal, toxic relationship like popcorn fodder? At what point before the bot armies and menâs rights activists poisoned the well of discourse around this trial could a reasonable assessment of the evidence and the facts have been made? Did that point ever exist?
Most of the reporting on these memes has placed the blame for their sensationalist tone squarely on the evolution of fandom content creation. But recall that the white supremacist alt-right movement has a long history of memeifying everything they want to normalize and legitimize, and keep in the forefront of your mind that the alt-right latched onto this case as its bulwark long before fandom and the internet at large did. By now, after years of political disinformation campaigns, weâre used to social mediaâs natural ability to contort reality. Rarely, however, has it bent this far, this rapidly, for this many people, in service of something this vile.
Again and again over the course of this trial, basic human empathy seems to have completely flown out the window. More than that, nuance feels impossible, and there doesnât seem to be room for even the reality of the situation. The contours of the abuse were well-established before the 2018 opinion column Depp is suing over was published.
The basic facts of the case have gotten their day in court once already, having been heard in a British court in 2020, with the judge finding in Heardâs favor. But the basic, well-established facts do not seem to matter.
They do not seem to matter to people who would normally care about facts, truth, and nuance. They do not seem to matter to the tabloid media gleefully reporting on every aspect of this case. They do not seem to matter to the TikTok creators who seize every chance to parody a tearful Heard, turning her objectively harrowing trial testimony into a farce of over-the-top fake weeping.
The facts do not seem to matter to any of the people who have gleefully latched on to the image of Heard as a manipulative villain, as if she split her own lip, punched her own face, and pulled out clumps of her own hair.
What weâre witnessing here are the dramatically compounded effects of internet researcher Alice Marwickâs theory of morally motivated networked harassment, which holds that a group of social media users can justify any amount of abuse directed at a target if they feel their cause is morally right. At scale, this looks like, and effectively is, millions of people around the world lining up to eagerly subject one woman to untold amounts of abuse, public humiliation, and violent rhetoric. (Incidentally, this is exactly what Depp wanted to happen to her â so even if he loses the case, he still wins.)
To be clear, this isnât an easy story of good and evil. Itâs impossible to completely absolve Amber Heard, who has her own alleged history of violence, or frame Depp as a monster incapable of kindness, charity, and the positive energy that amassed him millions of fans to begin with. Yet you donât need to do either of those things to acknowledge that this is a case about the deeply unfunny topic of intimate partner abuse and that the major points of this trial have already been decided in one court of law. The judge at the first trial in 2020 found Heard had proven 12 of 14 allegations of abuse. So far none of the trial testimony has substantially contradicted anything in Heardâs original claim of being a domestic violence survivor.
Culture critic Ella Dawson has a Twitter thread compiling reporting on the myriad ways in which this trial is not only destroying years of progress made against domestic abuse in the US, but also laying the groundwork for a culture in which bots and bad actors harass, vilify, and eviscerate all other prominent women who publicly name their abusers â like Gamergate, but times tens of millions of participants, and gleefully endorsed by people all across American culture.
That, above all â above the TikTok cat memers mocking Heard and Saturday Night Live dismissing the whole trial as âfor funâ â is whatâs absolutely jawdropping here. This trial, which amounts to a simple yes/no question over whether Heard had the right to call herself a victim of domestic abuse in a single sentence from that 2018 opinion piece, has somehow united far-right misogynists with middle-of-the-road liberals and geeky progressive fandom acolytes of Depp.
People who have spent the last decade hashtagging #believewomen, fighting online harassment campaigns, and, especially, resisting white male supremacy have, over the course of this trial, crawled into bed with the vilest kinds of internet refuse â at least 11 percent of whom donât actually exist, according to one bot researcher â possibly all because they really like Captain Jack Sparrow.
The sheer volume of this cultural takeover by Depp acolytes has created a seismic value shift to a degree that may be unalterable. Trial watchers seem to be welcoming misinformation about the trial while doing everything they can to reject or undermine actual documented facts of the case.
Some of the arguments made against Amber Heard sound like QAnon-level conspiracy rabbit holes. (Amber Heardâs trial outfits, for example, have somehow become part of a sinister narrative in which Heard is a manipulative abuser attempting to rattle and intimidate Depp by mimicking his own trial suits.) This trial has accomplished what our enraged, paranoid ideological fringe could not: a complete dismantling of the ideological breakdown that has divided us politically, and the general public acceptance of a narrative created and controlled by bad actors and far-right extremists.
The Depp-Heard trial has refined the Gamergate playbook in a way that will haunt us for years to come. It has proven to extremists that if you rally around the right beloved public figure or institution, blanket them in a protective sphere of outrage and misinformation, and weaponize fandom culture â already so prone to ideological radicalization and irrational groupthink â you can successfully push whatever media narrative you want into the mainstream.
Thereâs no coming back from this. The actual trial verdict is all but irrelevant now. Itâs not just that Amber Heard will forever be an imperfect accuser whose own volatile history was used to help destroy a revelatory movement in Me Too. Itâs that there will be other Amber Heards, and many of them will be marginalized, with far fewer resources to withstand this onslaught of hate.
Itâs not a coincidence that this spectacle is playing out against a backdrop of perpetually escalating racist violence and the rapid erosion of decades of human rights for women, queer, and trans people. The Depp-Heard trial has just trained millions of people to discard their own empathy, their own rational judgment, in exchange for the gleeful mockery, rejection, and belittlement of a woman making herself vulnerable in public. If you donât think that training will be weaponized against vulnerable targets, you havenât been paying attention.
Very ill advised to back a chap accused of domestic violence with a little knowledge of him socially, the old street angel home devil comes to mind
Many domestic abusers are âlovelyâ people out in the world
Sheâd have been better off to keep her counsel
2 Likes
Good article but no mention of the fact that she has hit Depp as well. Talks of her alleged history of violence (with others) but leaves out the fact that he has recordings of her talking about how she hit him. Still Iâd imagine heâs been the aggressor more often than not. Seems to have been an incredibly weird, toxic relationship. Thank fuck Iâm not on twitter i suppose. Thatâs my take awayâŚ