Itâs personality mate, you could sense the delight here when people realised who it was, obviously not everybody but it was plain to see.
I make no defence, it was a terrible thing to do.
St Martin
1 Like
This is true. But you could also sense the delight when fellas thought it might be CiarĂĄn Whelan when @myboyblue was having his bit of craic.
2 Likes
They arenât.
It has fuck all to do with me dicko.
Cusack wanted leniency for his mate who is a convicted paedophile.
@Sidney supports leniency for paedophiles.
Thatâs the nuts & bolts of it and none of it has any connection whatsoever to do with me.
I always suspected both characters were very very strange men and I was ahead of the curve on That I suppose and have been fully vindicated.
1 Like
Learn what a paedophile is.
Didnât you once admit letting your kid walk into the room while you were fucking a prostitute? You did, didnât you?
Youâre about the last person on this forum who should be talking about sexual deviancy.
1 Like
You are campaigning passionately for Leniency for paedophiles.
You rarely get any fresh air and spend your days crusading for the rights of child groomers.
So the story about the kid and the brazzer is true? 
animal
Itâs not. You as a teacher should not go that route.
Does anyone know why the references werenât published? If they form part of the judicial process then surely they should be publicly available unless thereâs a good reason otherwise?
Hook called rapists scumbags, he rambled on on a bad tangent about responsibility but never said otherwise about the rapists.
Cusack acted to get an actual convicted child rapist a more lenient sentence.
Ignore the victim blaming, observe the different attitudes to the perpetrators.
Iâm pretty sure I remember you posting something to the effect that one of your kids walked in on one of your encounters, mate.
And Iâm not dreaming this up.
It was around 2013 when you were regaling the board with your tales of the sexual exploits which you purchased.
Why on earth would you do that?
But sure thatâs exactly what youâve done
Youâre ignoring the fact that someone is pleading for leniancy for a child rapist bro, i can ignore the misguided rambling of hook as a far lesser evil
Plus it was mentioned above but you chose to ignore it (a key debating tactic of yours) that the guards gave a warning for women in a certain area not to walk alone home, be vigilant etc. Do you think those guards should be fired for victim blaming?
Christ
Find it, you have plenty of time sure all you have on is emptying bedpans and crusading leniency for Child groomers and paedophiles
Fixed
Egging weirdos like @Sydney on in his campaign for leniency for paedophiles is not something a school teacher should be doing.
If your disagree then carry-on, itâs your career.