Innuendo? Do you understand the word?
People were convicted.
People down there of a certain generation know well what went on. There is no innuendo. There was abuse, attacks, suicide and much else over the years attached to it.
Now that this case has been sentenced, @Little_Lord_Fauntleroy is right, there should be statements from the club, the county, and the Camogie/GAA. Vincents declined to comment in depth at the time, which is fair enough, but there should be something forthcoming now.
Yes. This isnât the case now, no mentor can directly contact a minor, but I am unaware if and when that changed. But for that reason alone, a comment should be forthcoming from all I named above.
can I ask how were their checks and vetting failed? Unless Humphries had prior, no checks or vetting would have highlighted anything.
Plus, with regards to texting the girl, it was said he got her number through a third party, so again, Iâm not sure how any procedural change would have done anything here to stop him. No mentor was to contact a child directly then either, but how do you stop them doing so if they just go ahead and do it anyway without anyone knowing?
If anything, it should be a wake up call to clubs in GAA and all sport really to ensure that they do follow correct protocol on all matters with underage coaching. It is a criminal offence now to coach without having the proper vetting, but as important is that the ethics courses should be 100% mandatory and coaches have to redo this every couple of years.