We were talking Arsenal earlier in this thread, interesting piece from the Guardian
Life gets hard for Arsene Wenger, also known as Mr Perfect
Oliver Kay
There is a banner unfurled at every Arsenal match that reads “Arsene knows”. As a tribute to the judgment of one of the greatest managers of his generation, it is perfect, a simple, reassuring mantra designed to keep at bay the kneejerk reactions that characterise an era of impatience.
In recent weeks, some of the knowledge that Arsne Wenger has imparted has been frightening. Recently, he was quoted as saying that Arsenal’s strategy is “to sell every year and to buy less expensive players . . . while having to free up, for 17 more years, an annual surplus of 24 million to pay for the stadium”. Depending on your view, this was either an affirmation of what was apparent or a shocking expos of the financial constraints under which he is working. Either way, in a summer when Mathieu Flamini, Gilberto Silva and Alexander Hleb have left, with Emmanuel Adebayor possibly to follow, it will have sent a shiver down the spine of many an Arsenal supporter.
What is the point of Arsenal? The question sounds flippant, but to judge from some of the noises coming out of the Emirates Stadium this summer, the club’s raison d’tre is no longer clear. They left Highbury partly to accommodate a growing support, but above all, according to David Dein, the former vice-chairman, “to compete financially with Chelsea, Manchester United and Real Madrid”.
Deloitte’s latest world football rich list has them in an impressive fifth place, with their revenues having increased by 37 per cent since leaving Highbury in 2006, and their next set of figures is likely to illustrate a further improvement. But to what end? If the goal is a healthy balance sheet, perfect. If it is success on the pitch, then it is a business plan that requires Wenger to perform miracles that may be beyond even his powers.
As a football business, Arsenal are brilliantly run, a model for others to aspire to, but for their strategy to succeed on the pitch, Wenger, to borrow a phrase from Rafael Bentez, the Liverpool manager, has to be perfect. While he may enjoy operating with one hand behind his back, which allows him to indulge in the developing and nurturing of technically talented young players, he is also a fearsome competitor who bristles at his team’s failure to win a trophy since 2005. Last season, having sold Thierry Henry to Barcelona, they challenged for the Barclays Premier League, finishing only four points behind Manchester United, the winners, and the Champions League, in which they lost to Liverpool in the quarter-finals, but it was a story of falling short when it mattered.
Next season is unlikely to be any easier. Like Sir Alex Ferguson, the United manager, Wenger has a knack of choosing the right moment to sell players (as with Emmanuel Petit, Marc Overmars, Patrick Vieira, Henry and countless others), but this is not the time that he would have chosen to lose Flamini, 24, Hleb, 27, and possibly Adebayor, 24. Flamini and Hleb would have stayed had they been offered the kind of wages that they will receive at AC Milan and Barcelona respectively. Wenger agrees with Arsenal’s stance on wages, a stance that is admirable in just about every respect, but while Arsenal may believe that they cannot afford to pay players sums in the region of 100,000 a week, it is reaching the stage when it may be more pertinent to ask whether they can afford not to.
Samir Nasri, the talented young France midfield player, has joined from Marseilles, but Wenger has suggested that further additions would “kill” the youngsters who are at the club. The Arsenal production line is remarkable, with Fran Mrida and Carlos Vela likely to break into the first-team squad this season after spells on loan to Real Sociedad and Osasuna respectively, while Cesc Fbregas, Theo Walcott and others aim to build on the progress they have made. But when they develop into world-class players, will Arsenal be willing to pay what is needed to get the most out of them or will they sell them on, replacing them with inexpensive, if supremely talented, youngsters? The experiences of Flamini, Hleb and possibly Adebayor suggest that Fbregas, for example, may have to move if he is to optimise his earning capacity, as all players like to do at some stage.
This was not meant to happen. Peter Hill-Wood, the Arsenal chairman, said before the stadium move that there was “no danger of a lack of money for players”, while Danny Fiszman, a director, said that “Arsne’s budget will not be affected in any way by this project”. But Wenger’s budget has been affected, dramatically, and it is testament to his genius that he continues to produce teams who can challenge for the leading honours. There is quite a difference, though, between challenging for trophies and winning them. And deep down, you suspect that Wenger knows that.