US Election result hub 2016

You cant rely on them pal.

Trump is more likely to prove ISISā€™s greatest recruiting sergeant yet.

ISISā€™s plan was to provoke the kind of backlash that would install leaders like Trump in western countries, and itā€™s working.

Ah hereā€¦Clintons backers created the fuckers in the first place in order to remove Assad.

Who armed the so-called moderate rebels?

Youā€™re at sea kid.

2 Likes

You are

1 Like

I know that, but Hollande is the most unpopular president in their history. With everything thatā€™s happened over the last 12 months, donā€™t bet against it

Ah Sid, will you give it a rest. Put down the phone and go to bed for a while, youā€™ve been up for days obsessing on this election.

1 Like

:joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:

:rollseyes: Shrieking Sidney is up out of the bed. Heā€™s having a terrible hard time dealing with this result.

Paul Ryan could end up being the biggest looser in this whole thing.

1 Like

The Arab Spring was a real thing, pal. It wasnā€™t created by ā€œthe Clintonsā€, or even ā€œtheir backersā€, and nor was ISIS.

The reality is that Saudi Arabia has been in a position of extreme economic strength due to a fortunate (for them, unfortunate for everybody else) geological coincidence which has enabled it to spread its toxic ideology.

That ideology was fertilised by Republican interference, most notably in 2003 in Iraq but before that in Afghanistan by Reagan, although the reality is that it was a rising tide which was merely waiting for a gap in the dyke to reach full flow.

Clintonā€™s association with Saudi Arabia is no different to anybody in power in the US going back decades.

Trump has business ties to Saudi Arabia and sold a floor of his skyscraper to the Saudi government. Heā€™s as in bed with the Saudis as anybody has been, as he also is with Goldman Sachs.

Thereā€™s a big difference between selling a hotel room to the Saudis then your soul for a certain Hawkish ideology.

The people you claim to represent have spokenā€¦Im not saying Trump is going to make a good presidentā€¦but Iā€™m glad she didnt get it.

With re to Goldman Sachs, they dont lose by betting on 1 horse in a 2 horse race. All of their credit default swaps have two legs sure.

1 Like

He has relations in Tipp.[quote=ā€œFagan_ODowd, post:529, topic:23356, full:trueā€]


[/quote]

A Ryan from Tipperary no wayšŸ˜Š

Heā€™s a great man, he sorted out a problem for a friend of mine from Cooraclare

1 Like

Are you not following events in Mosul? ISIS are on their last legs and are all but wiped out.

1 Like

heā€™s heading is spinning

Hillary Clinton did not have a particularly hawkish ideology compared to the decision makers in most US administrations since World War II. The Obama administration has been relatively isolationist in its policies compared to most. That hasnā€™t stopped them from being criticised for being too interventionist by the same people who simultaneously criticise them for not being interventionist enough.

With regard to Goldman Sachs, a 17 year company veteran is poised to be Trumpā€™s Treasury Secretary. Trump is against financial regulation. Clintonā€™s position on financial regulation was considerably more interventionist.

Em, I donā€™t claim to represent anybody. Do you claim such or do other posters?

Thatā€™s not what Donald Trump says.

Have you not been following the US campaign?

What a change the thicko