Sidney once again illustrating his compete and utter ignorance of US politics, and swallows alt-left propaganda as if it were gospel. The executive branch have no power to stop a hearing or anyone testifying to congress, whether House or Senate, that’s why we have separation of powers. This country is a proper Republic, not a pretend banana republic. Yates and Clapper are scheduled to appear before the house after the Senate hearing.
The only interesting story here is that Susan Rice, Obama’s NSA director, has refused to testify, leading to the obvious question what has she to hide. I think we know the answer, Obama was spying on Trump and his campaign before the election.
Yates getting grilled now on overstepping her authority and overriding intelligence decisions.
So, why isn’t Susan Rice testifying? Yates and Clapper are testifying. Trump’s associates who have been implicated and accused of wrongdoing by the press offered to testify, before they were asked.
It’s a bit odd a former NSA director, who would know more than anyone about what was going on in terms of intelligence collection of US citizens is refusing to testify, don’t you think. What could possibly be her motivation?
Alt-Left lies, but keep believing it.
The executive branch have no control over what hearings congress decide to hold and who they decide to call to said hearings. Try and learn a little about the subject you are blabbering on about.
The real story here, which will come out eventually, is that Obama was spying on the Trump campaign. Legitimate business contacts between Trump associates and Russia is a red herring.
As I don’t have time to educate you further, here’s my prediction for what will happen:
Flynn will get a slap on the wrist as there is most likely no evidence he lied to the FBI.
None of Trump’s associates or those involved in his campaign will be prosecuted, as if doing business in Russia is deemed to be problematic, lots of Democrats and Republicans need to be prosecuted.
The question of who authorized spying on Trump’s campaign will not be answered as those who know will refuse to testify. There is no reason to refuse to testify unless you are hiding something, and don’t want to take the fifth in front of the American public, like Clinton’s aides during the email server investigation.
Let’s get your prediction, so you can be wrong again.
Is the irony of this statement completely lost on you? Maybe bringing yourself to admit your own statement’s applicability to yourself would be a positive step.
I’m capable of independent thought, pal, unlike yourself, who’s only contribution to this thread has been to continually come in and sycophantically lick your equally brainwashed mate @anon7035031’s ass when he’s getting a kicking. You have yet to make a post of any substance on it.
To paraphrase Stephen Colbert, you’re nothing but @anon7035031’s cock holster. You clearly enjoy the taste.
No you idiot, I refuse to take at face value media reprorts from outlets that are so biased. Washington Post, New York Times and CNN in particular were in bed with the Clinton campaign. CNN fed debate questions to Clinton in advance ffs how much more evidence do you want than that.
You are the one who believes and posts every bit of nonsense from the left, try thinking for yourself for a change.
The reason I don’t post my opinions on US politics here is simple; I refuse to engage with a deranged fuck like you, on a topic you have little or no working knowledge of, but have opinions that you are more than happy to ram down everyone’s throat. You are a cunt of the highest order, and it is a testament for how chaotic the moderation is on this site when you’re hate-filled attacks consistently go unchecked.
