Does anyone watch cnn these days? Sheâd reach far more people if she went on the âJoe Rogan Experienceâ
They are third biggest behind Fox and MSNBC but thereâs been a big drop off across the board of people watching news on TV.
Thankfully Joe wouldnât have that vacuous cunt on heâs show
Ah here. She might be really intelligent and interestingâŚbut the democrats are keeping those qualities under wrapsâŚin case @Alphakrul1 turns agin her
What election fraud? Hilary spending four years whinging about Russia?
The dems sued RFK for even trying to be on the ballot. They put a an they knew was in serious cognitive decline up for re-election without any opposition.
Look mate. You havent lived if you dont have a bit of cognitive decline
Sheâd win the election pulling up if she went on Joe
I find it a bit amusing that between the two parties itâs the democrats you consider anti-democratic. Surely refusing to accept election results or restricting voting rights are about the most antidemocratic things a party could do?
1 Like
Stopping people running is equally undemocratic.
And the dems didnât accept 2016
And they pressured the censorship of Hunter Bidens laptop
You may as well be trying to explain maths to the cat
4 Likes
I donât pay very close attention to American politics but I donât think youâre correct there. The entire republican party says the last election was âstolenâ. They donât accept the election results. I donât think the democrats have ever done or said anything like that.
A party changing their candidate is undemocratic now? I donât think you understand democracy.
2 Likes
Rogans interview with Bernie was excellent, but he had coherent ideas, could expand and explain them. Harris must be an imbecile
Itâs no wonder the democrats had to do the dirt on Saunders
2 Likes
Iâd agree sheâs still a bit of an unknown quantity but itâs a testament to how poor a candidate Trump is and the utter capitulation of the Republican Party to the MAGA headbangers that sheâs generated such momentum and is prob the slight favourite to win now. A previous republican candidate like McCain or Romney would be romping home at this point.
The democrats used to be the losers but incredibly the republicans seem keen to grab the title. If they lose this election theyâve lost 4 out of the last 5. But pinning your hopes on a slob like Trump for the guts of a decade - and gutting your party while doing so - is the kind of thing weird losers do.
So Harris shouldnât have a shot but she lucked out to end up in a two horse race with about the one type of candidate she can beat.
1 Like
Explain it to me then. Hilary repeatedly says Russia stole the 2016 election.
The democrats censored the laptop story, just as it approached the election.
They did everything they could to stop RFK running.
1 Like
If the republicans had any sort of normal candidate theyâd beat her easy. Itâs some cock up by them if they lose.
Yes because RFK is a raging fucking lunatic. Why would anybody want him running ?
Is that the same as the entire party not accepting the election results? It doesnât seem to me to be the same thing.
I donât know anything about âthe laptop storyâ. Sounds like hokum though.
Canât imagine why they wouldnât encourage RFK to run.
Regardless, itâs not democratic to supress and actively try stop someone running. Let the electorate decide
1 Like
Splitting hairs.
Not hokum. Direct electoral interference. Right before the election.
Surely letting him run would be the Democratic thing to do?
1 Like
Letting ordinary people make decisions is not something lefties can tolerate