Thatâs whatâs called a three pointer in the cancellation stakes
This article is essential reading.
Israel has lied and lied and lied and lied and lied and lied and lied and lied and lied and lied and lied.
And lied and lied and lied and lied and lied and lied and lied.
A truly epic fraud that will live in infamy in history.
February 7 2024, 6:00 a.m.
TWO WEEKS BEFORE Hamas commandos led a series of raids into Israel on October 7, Benjamin Netanyahu stood before an empty chamber at the United Nations headquarters in New York City. The Israeli prime minister brandished a map of what he promised could be the âNew Middle East.â It depicted a state of Israel that stretched continuously from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. On this map, Gaza and the West Bank were erased. Palestinians did not exist.
âWhat a historic change for my country! You see, the land of Israel is situated on the crossroads between Africa, Asia, and Europe,â Netanyahu bellowed at a handful of spectators in the large hall, nearly all of whom were his loyalists or underlings. âFor centuries, my country was repeatedly invaded by empires passing through it in their campaigns of plunder and conquest elsewhere. But today, as we tear down walls of enmity, Israel can become a bridge of peace and prosperity between these continents.â
During that speech, Netanyahu portrayed the full normalizing of relations with Saudi Arabia, an initiative spearheaded under the Trump administration and embraced by the Biden White House, as the linchpin of his vision for this ânewâ reality, one which would open the door to a âvisionary corridor that will stretch across the Arabian Peninsula and Israel. It will connect India to Europe with maritime links, rail links, energy pipelines, fiber-optic cables.â
He was speaking on the grand stage of the U.N. General Assembly, but no world leaders bothered to attend. Outside, some 2,000 people, a mixture of American Jews and Israeli citizens, protested his attacks on the independence of the Israeli judiciary system. The scene served as a reminder of how deeply unpopular his far-right governing coalition, not to mention Netanyahu himself, had become in Israel. At that moment, it seemed that Netanyahu was pushed against the ropes, in a losing battle to continue his political reign.
Just days later, as Hamas commandos penetrated the barriers encircling Gaza and embarked on their deadly raids targeting several military installations as well as kibbutzim, everything changed in an instant. Everything, that is, except the primary agenda that has been at the center of Netanyahuâs long political career: the absolute destruction of Palestine and its people.
Just as the Bush administration exploited the 9/11 attacks to justify a sweeping war in which it declared the world a battlefield, Netanyahu is using the horrors of October 7 to wage the crusade heâs been preparing for his entire political career. With his grip on power fading last fall, the October 7 attacks provided him with just the opportunity he needed, and he hitched his political survival to the war on Gaza and what could be his last chance to eliminate Israelâs Palestinian problem once for all.
In that sense, Bibi was saved by Hamas.
Intelligence Failures
Four months in, Netanyahuâs war of annihilation against Gaza has become a guerrilla war of attrition. Not a single Israeli hostage has been freed through military force, and Hamas has shown an enduring resilience and ability to pick off Israel Defense Forces soldiers. The Israeli public, outside of the ideological true believers intent on occupying and settling Gaza, is showing signs of fatigue and desperation. Many family members of captives are growing louder in their demands for an immediate deal with Hamas that centers the lives of their loved ones over the political agenda laid out by Netanyahu and his clique. Some have demanded new elections or Netanyahuâs resignation. Protests against the war, though small, are beginning to grow inside Israel, with some demonstrations echoing global calls demanding a humanitarian ceasefire and an end to Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory.
As the death toll in Gaza surpasses a conservative estimate of 27,000 lives, many of the core narratives deployed by the Israeli and U.S. governments to justify the slaughter are coming under increased scrutiny; some have been definitively debunked. In Israel, this is a delicate line of inquiry. That Hamas killed large numbers of Israelis is not in doubt. But how they managed to do so while living under the lauded and vigilant eyes of the Mossad, Shin Bet, the Israeli Security Agency, and the IDF is the subject of mounting public attention.
There have been several credible reports that Israeli intelligence analysts warned that Hamas operatives appeared to be training for raids into Israel. The New York Times and other outlets have reported on the existence of a 40-page internal Hamas document code-named âJericho Wall.â Purportedly obtained by Israeli intelligence, it is said to lay out detailed plans by Hamas to conduct precisely the type of assault against Israeli military installations and villages that occurred on October 7.
While warnings from Israeli analysts who reviewed the document were reportedly brushed aside by senior officials, last July a signals intelligence officer urged the chain of command to take it seriously. Noting a recent daylong training exercise by Hamas in Gaza, the analyst asserted that the training precisely mirrored the operations laid out in the document. âIt is a plan designed to start a war,â she pleaded. âItâs not just a raid on a village.â
The night before Hamasâs raid, intelligence analysts began reporting significant evidence suggesting that Hamas might be preparing for an attack inside Israel. The head of Shin Bet traveled to the south and orders were issued to deploy a special counterterror force to confront any potential incursions, according to an investigative reportOpens in a new tab in the Israeli publication Yedioth Ahronoth.
Shortly after 3 a.m. on October 7, a senior intelligence official concluded the activity in Gaza was likely another Hamas training exercise, saying, âWe still believe that [Hamas leader Yahya] Sinwar is not pivoting towards an escalation.â
A few hours later, as Israeli officials gathered in a command center chaotically scrambling to deploy forces to respond to the multipronged attacks led by Hamas, a senior officer silenced the room: âThe Gaza Division was overpowered.â
Early on in the war against Gaza, Netanyahu sought to deflect blame for failing to foresee Hamasâs attacks onto his intelligence services. âContrary to the false claims: Under no circumstances and at no stage was Prime Minister Netanyahu warned of Hamasâs war intentions,â read a tweet posted on Netanyahuâs official Twitter account. âOn the contrary, all the security officials, including the head of military intelligence and the head of the Shin Bet, assessed that Hamas had been deterred and was looking for a settlement. This assessment was submitted again and again to the prime minister and the cabinet by all the security forces and intelligence community, up until the outbreak of the war.â
But serious questions lingered over how Hamas was able to lay siege to large sections of what Israel calls the âGaza envelopeâ and whether Netanyahu had knowledge that an attack of this very nature was being planned in full view of Israelâs extensive surveillance systems and spy networks. There is also a mounting body of evidence to indicate that Israeli forces were given orders on October 7 to stop Hamasâs attacks at all costs, including the killing of Israeli civilians taken captive by Palestinian fighters. The Israeli military has indicated that it plans to conduct an âuncompromisingâ investigation into the intelligence failures, drawing the ire of some far-right members of Netanyahuâs government.
Under fire from his own ministers and supporters for impugning Israeli military and intelligence agencies, Netanyahu apologized for his comments, deleted the tweet, and then shifted to the stance he now repeats: There will be a time for such inquiries â but only after Israel achieves total victory in Gaza and eliminates Hamas. âThe only thing that I intend to have resign is Hamas,â he said in November. âWeâre going to resign them to the dustbin of history.â
Information Warfare
The violent ethnonationalist ideology at the center of Netanyahuâs reign was born before his tenure and will endure when heâs gone. But his rule has embodied the most extremist and destructive version of the Israeli state project.
Netanyahu understands the power of defining and dominating the narrative, particularly when targeting it to U.S. audiences. For decades, he has advanced the Israeli propaganda doctrine of hasbara â the notion that Israelis must be aggressive about âexplainingâ and justifying their actions to the West â to manipulate his adversaries and allies, domestic and international, into serving his objectives.
Netanyahuâs âvision of himself as the chief defender of the Jewish people against calamity allowed him to justify almost anything that would keep him in power,â observed former President Barack Obama in his 2020 memoir.
In the aftermath of October 7, Netanyahu cast Israelâs siege of a tiny strip of land the size of Philadelphia as a war of the worlds in which the very fate of humanity was at stake. âItâs not only our war. Itâs your war too,â Netanyahu said in his first interview on CNN after the October 7 attacks. âItâs the battle of civilization against barbarism. And if we donât win here, this scourge will pass. The Middle East will pass to other places. The Middle East will fall. Europe is next. You will be next.â
The Israeli government rapidly deployed a multipronged propaganda strategy to win unprecedented support from the U.S. and other Western governments for a sweeping war against the entire population of Gaza. To oppose Israelâs war is antisemitic; to question its assertions about the events of October 7 is akin to Holocaust denial; to protest the mass killing of Palestinian civilians is to do the bidding of Hamas.
At the center of Israelâs information warfare campaign is a tactical mission to dehumanize Palestinians and to flood the public discourse with a stream of false, unsubstantiated, and unverifiable allegations.
âWe were struck Saturday by an attack whose savagery I can say we have not seen since the Holocaust,â Netanyahu told President Joe Biden in a phone call on October 11. âThey took dozens of children, bound them up, burned them and executed them.â He added: âWe have never seen such savagery in the history of the state. Theyâre even worse than ISIS and we need to treat them as such.â
âWe are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly,â said Israelâs Defense Minister Yoav Gallant on October 9.
The message of these statements and others like them was clear: Israel is confronting monsters, and no one has any business telling the Jewish state, established in the aftermath of World War II under the mantra of âNever again,â how to respond to an attempted genocide. Israeli officials routinely invoke the Holocaust, compare Hamas to the Nazis or to ISIS, and portray the events of October 7 as evidence of an organized effort to commit genocide against the Jewish people.
On October 10, three days after the attacks, the Israeli military organized a tour for international journalists to view the scene at Kfar Aza Kibbutz. As they guided reporters and camera crews through the community, IDF officials spread rumors that as many as 40 babies had been murdered by Hamas, some of them beheaded. âItâs something I never saw in my life. Itâs something I used to imagine of my grandmother and my grandfather in Europe and other places,â an Israeli general told reporters. âWe got very, very disturbing reports that came from the ground that there were babies that had been beheaded,â said IDF spokesperson Jonathan Conricus in a briefing for international journalists. âI admit it took us some time to really understand and to verify that report. It was hard to believe that even Hamas could perform such a barbaric act.â
Lt. Col. Guy Basson, deputy commander of the Israeli armyâs Kfir Brigade, claimed that he saw the aftermath of eight babies who were executed in a nursery at Kibbutz Beâeri. Among the victims, Basson asserted, was also a survivor of the Auschwitz death camp. âI see the number engraved on her arm, and you say to yourself, she went through the Holocaust in Auschwitz and ended up dying on Kibbutz Beâeri.â Another Israeli soldier told a journalist that âbabies and children were hung on a clothes line in a row.â
Three weeks after the October 7 attacks, Eli Beer, the head of a volunteer EMS squad in Israel, traveled to the U.S. and addressed a gathering at the convention of the Republican Jewish Coalition in Las Vegas. âI saw in my own eyes a woman who was pregnant, four months pregnant,â he said. âThey came into her house, in front of her kids, they opened up her stomach took out the baby, and stabbed the little, tiny baby in front of her and then shot her in front of her family and then they killed the rest of the kids.â
Beer offered graphic descriptions of other horrors he claimed to have witnessed. âThese bastards put these babies in an oven and put on the oven. We found the kid a few hours later,â he told the U.S. audience on October 28. âI saw little kids who were beheaded. We didnât know which head belonged to which kid.â Beer, whose stories were widely reported in the international media, also met with Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Israel soon after the attack.
But there is a problem with the gut-wrenching narratives that have bolstered the underlying justification for the slaughter of Gaza: They are either complete fabrications or have not been substantiated with a shred of evidence. Many have been thoroughly disproven by major Israeli media outlets.
In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, Netanyahu and other Israeli officials presented U.S. and international leaders with a range of graphic images and videos along with unverified narrative explanations for what they allegedly depicted. âItâs simply depravity in the worst imaginable way,â Blinken said after first viewing the photos. âImages are worth a thousand words. These images may be worth a million.â
In a coup for Netanyahuâs hasbara campaign, Biden and other leaders have laundered many of Israelâs obscene lies. Beginning just days after October 7, Biden repeatedly claimed that he personally saw photographs of beheaded babies and more atrocities. Even after the White House admitted Biden had seen no such photos, he continued to make the allegation, including after visiting Netanyahu and other Israeli officials in Tel Aviv. âI saw some of the photographs when I was there â tying a mother and her daughter together on a rope and then pouring kerosene on them and then burning them, beheading infants, doing things that are just inhuman â totally, completely inhuman,â Biden said at a campaign event in December.
Blinken told the U.S. Senate another harrowing story about how Hamas terrorists had tortured a family in their living room while intermittently taking breaks to eat a meal their victims had placed on the dining table before the horrors began that morning. âA young boy and girl, 6 and 8 years old, and their parents around the breakfast table. The fatherâs eye gouged out in front of his kids. The motherâs breast cut off, the girlâs foot amputated, the boyâs fingers cut off before they were executed,â Blinken said. âAnd then their executioners sat down and had a meal. That is what this society is dealing with.â
The story Blinken told about terrorists eating a meal while torturing an Israeli family, as well as some of the assertions about decapitated babies, was based on the speculative fiction invented by Yossi Landau, an official from the scandal-plagued private Israeli rescue organization Zaka, who has repeatedly spread wildly false stories.
There was no Holocaust survivor killed at Kibbutz Beâeri that day. There were no mass beheadings of babies, no group executions in a nursery, no children hung from clotheslines, and no infants placed in ovens. No pregnant woman had her stomach cut open and the fetus knifed in front of her and her other children. These stories are entirely fictional, a set of audacious lies weaponized to generate the type of collective rage used to justify the unjustifiable.
According to major Israeli media outlets that have worked diligently to identify all the victims of the October 7 attacks, there was one infant killed that day: a 9-month-old named Mila Cohen who was shot dead at Kibbutz Beâeri as her mother held her in her arms. Cohenâs mother, who was wounded by gunfire, survived. Among the other civilians killed on October 7, seven of them were between the ages of 2 and 9 years, and 28 were between the ages of 10 and 19. Fourteen of these children died in Hamas rocket attacks, not at the hands of the armed commandos who stormed the kibbutzes.
There is no doubt that widespread atrocities and war crimes were committed during the Hamas-led attacks of October 7. It is also true that Israeli military, government, and rescue officials have engaged in a deliberate misinformation campaign about the nature of many deaths that occurred that day.
Israeli officials have toured the world with a film produced at the direction of the IDF. The 47-minute âBearing Witness to the October 7 Massacreâ features video allegedly seized from Palestinian attackers equipped with GoPro cameras and cellphones, according to Israeli officials. The movie has not been released to the public and has only been available via special invitation from the Israeli government. Its audiences have included Hollywood celebrities, dozens of U.S. lawmakers and government officials, journalists, and global luminaries; it has screened at various international venues, including museums established in memory of the Holocaust. While hours of footage of the attacks and their aftermath are available online, including video shot by Palestinians who participated in the raids, the Israeli government has said the footage is too sensitive to be publicly released.
An IDF official, in uniform, personally delivers the professionally produced Digital Cinema Package for the screenings, and viewers are required to sign nondisclosure agreements affirming they will not record or distribute the footage. âIt will change the way you view the Middle East and the way you view the war in Gaza,â said Gilad Erdan, Israelâs ambassador to the United Nations, at the Los Angeles premiere of the footage last November. The film was characterized in media accounts as depicting âmurder, beheadings, rapes and other atrocities against Jewish adults and children.â
The event, at the Museum of Tolerance, was organized by Israeli actor Gal Gadot, star of the âWonder Womanâ movies, for film executives and other members of the Hollywood industry. âHamas must be eradicated. This is the only way to prevent another massacre,â Erdan added. âIf Israel doesnât eradicate this evil, mark my words: The West is next.â
While Israel has emphasized how incendiary the footage is, British journalist Owen Jones, who attended an IDF screening in the U.K., said a âsignificant amountâ of the video is already in the public domain. He said that while there was footage of one IDF soldier who had apparently been decapitated, as well as the already public footage of an unsuccessful attempt to behead a migrant Thai worker with a garden tool, there was no footage substantiating allegations of torture, sexual violence, and mass beheadings, including of babies or other children. âClearly this footage hasnât been selected at random. You would expect it to be the worst material that they have,â Jones said. âThis isnât to say none of this happened, itâs just not in the footage, which has been provided by the Israeli authorities.â
Israelâs hasbara campaign is reminiscent of the Bush administrationâs monthslong carnival of lies, sanitized and promoted by major media outlets, about alleged weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. And Biden directly participated in President George W. Bushâs campaign as well. In his October 2002 Senate floor speech endorsing war against Iraq, Biden declared that Saddam Hussein âpossesses chemical and biological weapons and is seeking nuclear weapons.â
Allegations of Systematic Rape
The Israeli propaganda machine is well oiled. Anyone can look back at Israelâs four-month war against Gaza and trace a pattern: Israel chooses an issue and demands global attention to its agenda at the expense of any other matter.
When news organizations began reporting on the civilian toll of Israelâs initial airstrikes against Gaza, the government accused photographers for major news organizations of being Hamas members or sympathizers who had foreknowledge of the October 7 attacks. Netanyahu said the journalists were âaccomplices in crimes against humanity.â Israel then portrayed Gazaâs hospitals as secret Hamas command centers, an allegation that the Biden administration bolstered as the IDF prepared to lay siege to Al-Shifa Hospital last November.
Throughout the war, Israel has sought to direct media and global attention to various new smoking-gun narratives. And in nearly every case, it succeeds in getting the U.S. on board to launder and promote the talking points.
In late November, as the civilian death toll in Gaza climbed, Israel was struggling to retain its dominance of the narrative. Global demands for a ceasefire were mounting, and even some of Israelâs allies were expressing horror at the indiscriminate killing of women and children and the worsening humanitarian catastrophe.
A weeklong truce, during which captives were exchanged, raised hopes that a more enduring peace deal could be on the horizon, despite Israeli insistence that that was out of the question. âA prolonged ceasefire that allows more hostages to be released, and that evolves towards a permanent ceasefire linked to a political process, is something we have consensus on,â said the EUâs top foreign policy official Josep Borrell.
Days earlier, the prime ministers of Spain and Belgium traveled to the Rafah border to push for such a deal and drew the fury of the Israeli government when they publicly condemned the indiscriminate killing of Palestinian civilians. Eli Cohen, then the Israeli foreign minister, accused the leaders of offering âsupport [for] terrorism,â while Netanyahu released a statement condemning them because they âdid not place total responsibility on Hamas for the crimes against humanity it perpetrated.â
It was at this moment that the Israeli government decided it needed to remind the world of Israelâs victimhood and launched a new phase of the hasbara campaign. It began accusing the international community of standing silent in the face of what Israeli officials described as a widespread campaign of rape and sexual violence aimed at Jewish women and orchestrated by Hamas on October 7. By early December, the issue had become a major focus of conservative media and Israelâs allies.
âI say to the womenâs rights organizations, to the human rights organizations, youâve heard of the rape of Israeli women, horrible atrocities, sexual mutilation? Where the hell are you?â Netanyahu said in a December 5 speech in Tel Aviv.
That day, on the other side of the globe, Biden was at a campaign fundraising event in Boston. âOver the past few weeks, survivors and witnesses of the attacks have shared the horrific accounts of unimaginable cruelty: reports of women raped â repeatedly raped and their bodies being mutilated while still alive, of women corpses being desecrated, and Hamas terrorists inflicting as much pain and suffering as â on women and girls as possible and then murdering them. And itâs appalling,â Biden said. âThe world canât just look away â whatâs going on. Itâs on all of us â the government, international organizations, civil society, individual citizens â to forcefully condemn the sexual violence of Hamas terrorists without equivocation â without equivocation, without exception.â
From the earliest moments following the October 7 attacks, Israel charged that women had been raped by Hamas fighters, though it was often an allegation made in sequence alongside other alleged atrocities. But in mid-November, those assertions began evolving into a sustained public blitz, accusing Hamas of instituting a plan to âsystematically rape women.â Israel government spokesperson Eylon Levy spoke of a âHamas rapist machine.â
âHamas used rape and sexual violence as weapons of war,â charged Erdan, the U.N. ambassador. âThese were not spur-of-the-moment decisions to defile and mutilate girls and parade them while onlookers cheered; rather, this was premeditated.â
To date, there has been no credible evidence presented publicly that such a campaign took place, and Hamas has vehemently denied that its fighters committed any acts of rape or sexual assault. The fact that Israel has not produced forensic evidence for individual rapes does not prove that no such deeds took place. Rape investigations are often complex, particularly when the crime occurs amid a chaotic scene of mass violence. Sexual violence is common in warfare, and it often takes years for the full story of such crimes to emerge.
But there is a difference between making specific allegations of rape or sexual assault and charging that organized mass rape was a central component of an operation meticulously planned over the course of years. Israelâs evidence of the latter comes nowhere near to measuring up to its claims.
Israeli rescue workers as well as civilian and military medical officials have described evidence of dead women who were naked or had clothing removed, as well as women who were subjected to genital mutilation, though they have not released documentary or forensic evidence.
But many of the most graphic allegations of mass rapes have been offered by Israeli military or rescue officials who acknowledge they have no training or expertise in forensics. Some of them, whose claims have been featured in many media accounts, also spread false stories about other alleged atrocities.
Shari Mendes, an architect serving in the IDF reserves in a rabbinical unit, was deployed to a morgue to prepare bodies for burial after the attacks. An American originally from New Jersey, Mendes did multiple TV and print interviews about her experiences. âWe have seen women who have been raped, from the age of children through to the elderly,â she told reporters, emphasizing, âThis is not just something we saw on the internet, we saw these bodies with our own eyes.â
For months, Mendes has served as one of the most visible witnesses bolstering Israelâs allegations of systematic rape. But few media outlets featuring her claims have mentioned the valid concerns about her credibility and her history of promoting a false story. She told the Daily Mail last October, âA baby was cut out of a pregnant woman and beheaded and then the mother was beheaded.â
On December 5, as Israel engaged in a global media push around its allegations that Hamas had committed mass rapes, Mendes was a featured speaker at an event in New York organized by Israelâs mission to the U.N. on sexual violence and the October 7 attacks. The Times of Israel reported that Mendes âis not legally qualified to determine rape.â
The observations of first responders or members of religious burial units, particularly those without relevant scientific credentials, are not a replacement for forensic documentation of an uncontaminated crime scene. Israeli authorities have said evidence that would typically be taken in cases of suspected sexual assault was not recovered in the aftermath of the attacks, attributing this failure to a combination of the magnitude of the deaths, the charred nature of some bodies, and to Jewish burial practices.
Some of the evidence publicly cited by Israeli officials is testimony provided by Zaka, the private Israeli rescue organization whose members have been widely documented to have spread false allegations. Haaretz published an exposĂŠ documenting Zakaâs role in the rampant mishandling of forensic evidence that day and its subsequent campaign of misinformation.
The Israeli government has maintained that it possesses evidence that has not been made public and has enlisted international teams of forensic and other crime scene experts. Israelâs Ministry of Welfare and Social Affairs told the New York Times there are âat least three women and one man who were sexually assaulted and survived.â
But other Israeli officials have stated that there are no known living victims of rape that day, while some have described the challenge of identifying potential victims.
On December 28, the New York Times published what instantly became the most widely circulated news story purporting to document a widespread campaign of sexual violence orchestrated by Hamas. That story has come under intense scrutiny, including within the Times newsroom.
The family of Gal Abdush, whose alleged rape was at the center of the Times article, disputed the articleâs assertion she was raped. One relative also suggested the family was pressured, under false pretenses, to speak with the reporters. Abdushâs sister wrote on Instagram that the Times reporters âmentioned they want to write a report in memory of Gal, and thatâs it. If we knew that the title would be about rape and butchery, weâd never accept that.â A woman who filmed Abdush on October 7 told YNet that Israeli journalists working for the Times had pressured her into giving the paper access to her photos and videos. âThey called me again and again and explained how important it is to Israeli hasbara,â she recalled. This series of events was documented extensively by Mondoweiss.
Critics of the Times story also pointed to the inconsistencies of the accounts of some of the alleged witnesses featured, as well as to its use of information provided by members of Zaka.
Several Israelis who survived the October 7 attacks have publicly claimed that they witnessed rapes by Palestinian assailants, but Israeli investigators have said they are still searching for supporting evidence. Authorities also say they must match alleged victims with specific eyewitness testimony in order to bring potential charges.
What often goes unmentioned in Israelâs sweeping allegations is an important fact: Hamas was not the only Palestinian group to attack Israelis on October 7. Many individuals who had no knowledge of Hamasâs plans poured across the border and committed acts of violence in what has been referred to as an unplanned âsecond wave.â Some of these non-Hamas Palestinians also took Israeli hostages back to Gaza.
One survivor of the Nova music festival massacre, a veteran of Israelâs special forces, has given multiple interviews to major media outlets, including the New York Times, about a rape he claims to have witnessed. During an appearance on CNN, Raz Cohen described the assailants as âFive guys â five civilians from Gaza, normal guys, not soldiers, not Nukhba,â referring to Hamasâs elite commando force. âIt was regular people from Gaza with normal clothes.â Cohen, it must be noted, has told varying, sometimes contradictory, versions of what he witnessed.
Israel has painted all actions on October 7 as being committed by Hamas and its fighters. That storyline obviously serves Israelâs military and political objectives, but the truth is more complicated.
In light of Israelâs well-documented campaign of lies and misinformation about other events on October 7, incendiary allegations, such as claims that Hamas engaged in a deliberate campaign of systematic rape, should be viewed with extreme skepticism.
Friendly Fire
As many U.S. media outlets and politicians have promoted and laundered Israelâs claims, spreading them far and wide, there have been strong voices among the Israeli public and media that have exhibited skepticism. This is especially true regarding the actions taken by Israeli forces as they responded to the October 7 attacks. Calls are growing inside Israel, led by survivors and victimsâ families, for the Israeli government to provide a factual explanation of precisely how their loved ones died: Were they killed by Palestinian militants or by the Israeli military?
Israeli media outlets have aired interviews with survivors and IDF personnel describing what they refer to as âfriendly fireâ incidents, including the shelling of a house where Hamas commandos were holding Israeli civilians hostage. Families of some Israelis killed at Kibbutz Beâeri have cited witnesses who said that an Israeli tank fired on a house filled with Israeli civilians held hostage on October 7. A dozen hostages, including 12-year-old twins, died inside the house after Israeli forces began shelling it.
âAccording to the evidence, the shooting of the tank was fatal and killed many hostages in addition to the terrorists,â the families [wrote](file:///Users/nausicaarenner/Downloads/seriousness%20of%20the%20incident,%20we%20do%20not%20think%20it%20is%20right%20to%20wait%20with%20the%20investigation%20until%20after%20the%20end%20of%20the%20war) in a January 4 letter to the IDFâs chief of staff. Given the âseriousness of the incident, we do not think it is right to wait with the investigation until after the end of the war.â They demanded a âcomprehensive and transparent investigation into the decisions and actions that led to this tragic outcome.â Israeli military Brig. Gen. Barak Hiram has since admitted he ordered the shelling that day. âThe negotiations are over,â he recalled saying. âBreak in, even at the cost of civilian casualties.â
Yasmin Porat, who had escaped the horrors at the Nova music festival and sought refuge in a home at Beâeri, offered extensive details on this incident, as Electronic Intifada reported. In a series of interviews on Israeli media, Porat described how Palestinian commandos entered the home and told the Israeli civilians they intended to take them hostage and, after moving them to a location with other hostages at the kibbutz, ultimately used their Israeli captives to contact the police to negotiate. âTheir objective was to kidnap us to Gaza. Not to murder us,â she told Israeli network Kan News. âAnd after we were there for two hours with the abductors, the police arrive. A gun battle takes place that our police started.â
Porat, who said her captors âtreated us very humanely,â described how she managed to escape the house by convincing one of the gunmen to exit with her. After using her as a âhuman shieldâ to exit the house, the Palestinian was taken into custody, and Porat remained on the scene as Israeli forces laid siege to the house. âThey eliminated everyone, including the hostages. There was very, very heavy crossfire,â she said. âEveryone was killed there. Just horrible.â
Other witnesses at Beâeri have described how Israeli forces were able to retake the kibbutz from Palestinian fighters only after the IDF shelled houses where hostages were being held.
There is also evidence indicating that Israeli forces responding to the attacks at the Nova music festival, where 364 people died, may have killed Israeli civilians as they attacked Palestinian militants, including with munitions fired from Apache helicopters. Yedioth Ahronoth and other major Israeli media outlets have published reports detailing the massive fire from combat helicopters and drones unleashed against the gunmen who violently stormed the festival. Military sources described the difficulty in distinguishing civilians from attackers, particularly in the early phases of the Israeli counterstrike.
In the most sweeping journalistic account to date of the events surrounding the Israeli militaryâs operations on October 7, Ronen Bergman and Yoav Zitun â two well-connected and prominent Israeli journalists âwrote about the state of chaos and panic within the security establishment. They described âa command chain that failed almost entirely and was entirely blindsided; orders to open fire on terrorist vehicles speeding towards Gaza even as there was a concern that they contained captives â some sort of renewed version of the Hannibal Directive.â
The Hannibal Directive, which dates back to 1986 and has been the subject of great controversy in Israel, authorized military forces to stop the kidnapping of Israeli soldiers at all costs, even if it meant shooting or injuring the captives. In a 2003 investigation, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported the broadly held understanding of the directive: âFrom the point of view of the army, a dead soldier is better than a captive soldier who himself suffers and forces the state to release thousands of captives in order to obtain his release.â
The Hannibal Directive was allegedly rescinded in 2016. But Bergman and Zitun report that by midday on October 7, the IDF issued a similar order, instructing all units to stop Hamas from bringing hostages back to Gaza and to do so âat any cost.â They describe Israeli helicopter gunships, drones, and tanks firing on any and all cars en route to Gaza, burning them and in some cases killing everyone inside the vehicles. Haaretz reported on an IDF commander, locked in a subterranean bunker, calling in a strike against his own bases âin order to repulse the terrorists.â
The truth is that we do not know how many of their own people Israeli forces killed during the counteroffensive on October 7. Nor do we know what happened in the firefights when armed Israelis, including kibbutz private security and military personnel, sought to defend their settlements.
Beyond the deadly shelling of the house at Beâeri, the public has been given very few details of what exactly transpired when official Israeli military forces deployed to confront the commandos from Gaza. Israeli military and police forces engaged in prolonged standoffs and shootouts with Palestinian gunmen holed up in houses, police stations, military installations, and other buildings, often holding hostages. In some cases, these battles went on for days.
In November, Netanyahu senior adviser Mark Regev was asked by MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan about some of the lies told by Israeli officials and soldiers about the events of October 7. Regev remarked that when a claim has been proven false, Israel retracts or clarifies it. âWe originally said, in the atrocious Hamas attack upon our people on October 7, we had the number at 1,400 casualties and now weâve revised that down to 1,200 because we understood that weâd overestimated, we made a mistake,â Regev said. He then added: âThere were actually bodies that were so badly burnt we thought they were ours; in the end, apparently they were Hamas terrorists.â
Israelâs social security agency has stated that the death toll from October 7 is 1,139 people. It has identified 695 Israeli civilians killed that day, along with 71 foreigners, most of whom were migrant laborers. Some 373 members of Israeli military and security forces were reported dead.
Israel has estimated that between 1,000 and 1,500 Palestinian fighters were killed that day, many of them during assaults launched with advanced weapons fired from tanks, helicopters, and drones. How many Israelis â soldiers and civilians â were killed in the chaos and had their deaths recorded as killed or sadistically burned alive by Hamas? How many Israeli lives were sacrificed under Hannibal-style orders to prevent them from being taken hostage at all costs?
The answers to these questions will bring no absolution to those who initiated the carnage on October 7. No civilians would have died in those Israeli communities had Hamas not launched its operations. It is also true that if Israel had not engaged in a 75-year campaign of ethnic cleansing and apartheid, there would not have been an October 7. The illusion promoted by the Israeli state that its people could live a bucolic life in the âGaza envelopeâ while their government enforced the caging and repression of 2.3 million Palestinians next door was shattered.
The families of the dead deserve to have answers. The specifics of what happened that day also matter because of how these events have shaped the public attitude toward Israelâs war, with its horrifying death toll, particularly among Palestinian children.
Faulty Justifications
Cynical manipulation of the truth has been a hallmark of Netanyahuâs career. He has long advocated for Hamas to achieve and maintain power in Gaza precisely because he believed it was the single best path to achieving his own colonial agenda.
âAnyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas,â Netanyahu told his Likud confederates in 2019. The logic was clear: The world will never give the Palestinians a state while Hamas remains in power. Thatâs why, since at least 2012, Netanyahu has facilitated the continued flow of money to Hamas.
By January 18, with the horrors in Gaza intensifying, U.S. and European diplomats were telling anyone who would listen that they were deep into planning for a âday afterâ scenario that would pave the way for a two-state solution. Netanyahu responded to this chatter by giving a televised speech in Hebrew. âI clarify that in any arrangement in the foreseeable future, with an accord or without an accord, Israel must have security control over the entire territory west of the Jordan River,â Netanyahu said. âThatâs a necessary condition. It clashes with the principle of sovereignty but what can you do?â
While it was reported as a defiant rebuke of his U.S. and European allies, there was nothing new in Netanyahuâs position. It has been the Likud partyâs official stance since its 1977 charter. âBetween the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty,â the document reads. âA plan which relinquishes parts of western Eretz Israel, undermines our right to the country, unavoidably leads to the establishment of a âPalestinian State,â jeopardizes the security of the Jewish population, endangers the existence of the State of Israel, and frustrates any prospect of peace.â
The lies that were spread in the immediate aftermath of the October 7 attacks did not end there. Nearly every week, sometimes every day, the Israeli government and military have unloaded a fresh barrage of allegations intended to justify the ongoing slaughter. The hospitals are Hamas, the U.N. is Hamas, journalists are Hamas, European allies are Hamas, the International Court of Justice is antisemitic. The tactic is effective, particularly because the U.S. and other major allies have consistently laundered Israelâs unverified allegations as evidence of the righteousness of the cause.
The latest example is Israelâs campaign to destroy UNRWA, the single most important humanitarian organization in Gaza, which was established in 1949 specifically to protect Palestinians violently expelled from their homes and land by the creation of the Israeli state. Almost immediately after the ICJ ruled against Israel in the genocide case brought by South Africa in The Hague, Israel accused 12 of the organizationâs 30,000 employees of participating in the October 7 attacks.
Israel then presented the U.S. and other governments with âintelligenceâ it claimed to have obtained from the interrogations of Palestinian captives, documents recovered from the bodies of dead Palestinians, seized cellphones, and signals intercepts. Israel charged that 10 percent of UNRWAâs 12,000-person local staff in Gaza had some form of âlinksâ to Hamas. âThe institution as a whole is a haven for Hamasâ radical ideology,â an anonymous senior Israeli official told the Wall Street Journal in a widely cited article penned by a former IDF soldier.
The innuendo-laced allegation of UNRWA staff having undefined âlinksâ to Hamas and Islamic Jihad, or âclose relativesâ who belong to the groups is a risible charge given that Hamas is not just an armed militia, but also the governing civil authority in Gaza.
The U.S. responded to Israelâs allegations by immediately announcing it was suspending all funding to UNRWA. âWe havenât had the ability to investigate [the allegations] ourselves,â Blinken admitted on January 30. Nonetheless, he declared: âThey are highly, highly credible.â
But journalists from Sky News reviewed the so-called dossier and reported, âThe Israeli intelligence documents make several claims that Sky News has not seen proof of and many of the claims, even if true, do not directly implicate UNRWA.â Britainâs Channel 4 also obtained the document and determined it âprovides no evidence to support its explosive new claim that UNRWA staff were involved with terror attacks on Israel.â The Financial Times, which also reviewed the materials, reported there were specific allegations of direct participation in the October 7 attacks against four Palestinians employed by UNRWA, not 12 as originally asserted.
This was a transparent attempt by Israel to distract from the rulings in the ICJ genocide case and to obliterate a U.N. agency that Israel has long viewed as an impediment to its goal of denying Palestinians the right to return to the homes and territory from which Israel expelled them. It was also an action that explicitly violated the orders issued by the world court, which directed Israel to âtake immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance.â Based on Israelâs sweeping and unverified allegations alone, the U.S. led scores of Western nations to denounce the U.N. agency and pull their funding at the moment it is needed most.
From weapons and intelligence to political, diplomatic, and legal support, Israel has wanted for nothing from the Biden administration. The mounting pile of Palestinian civilian corpses and their surviving family members, meanwhile, are relegated to the workshopped afterthoughts uttered by Western politicians who have been told they should occasionally squeeze a line or two into their speeches about death and suffering in Gaza.
Propaganda and weaponized lies can only obscure the dead bodies, the forced starvation, the mass killing of children, and the utter destruction of an entire society for so long. Over time, it becomes increasingly difficult to conceal the nexus between the actions taken by Israel after October 7, the mendacious narratives it deployed, and Netanyahuâs desperate struggle to retain political power and his personal liberty. The 1,200 Israeli and international victims of October 7, and the more than 27,000 Palestinians whose deaths were justified in their names, deserve an unvarnished rendering of the truth.
The 1/33 on Israel was free money in fairness.
2 Likes
As Babs Keating said in the Sunday Times the morning of the 2004 Leinster semi final⌠you wouldnât get a return on investment by putting 10k on KK to win today anywhere else
2 Likes
10/1 a load of us backed Wexford at that day. By throw in theyâd been backed into 13/2 which is a fair movement for a GAA market.
And then Zidane beat England.
What. A. Day.
You wouldnt like drawing a fella like that on you on Social Media for a simple post about the Basketball.
Itâs going back a long time with him, before the events of this week. Listen, we are all anti Semites and might as well deal with it.
Right so, Iâll do my best, but Iâm so busy down on the farm I wonât have much time for the olâ anti semitism.
Ah here @mbb and tracky fully support Israel.
Look at this fuckin propaganda
https://twitter.com/AdamParkhomenko/status/1756701953323573310?t=rOlO8ARVlOQ-_jQwv7RLRg&s=19
This is just horrifying and sickening. The IDF are monstrous.
Correction. The state of Israel is monstrous. Most of Israeli society is monstrous.
Israeli ambassador on the news at one just there, Dobbo let her off rather lightly.
I though he was reasonably robust with her. She was becoming more shrill as the interview went on as he was he wasnât accepting her lies and whataboutery without question
1 Like
He did challenge some bit but certainly could have put a lot more to her I thought.
What do you expect from a limited time interview at 1?
She was going to have her angle and not stray from it regardless
Elon Musk isnât so big on free speech when it shows Israel up for what they are.
https://twitter.com/omarsuleiman504/status/1757024367135834560
The images from Gaza of the Rafah massacre by Israel last night look like a horror movie. Children dangling with limbs blown off, or crawling screaming with their dying breaths. Parents picking up the heads of their babies that are barely recognizable. The hundreds stacked like bodies in a slaughterhouse.
The fact that their stories will be erased in mainstream media while videos are being suppressed on social media tells you all you need to know. Any semblance of international law or standard for humanity is dead. Palestinian life under occupation never mattered to you before, so our deaths under genocide donât matter to you now.
Donât ever lecture us on morality again. Your hearts are dead.