It is clearly desireable, but viewing this as a problem that can be solved along a hierarchy of âanswersâ misses the point completely.
What restraints are on adoption?
My morals are formed in a belief in equality and a right for everyone to be afforded the chance to live. I can contrast that with the Yes side who want to deny the right to live for selfish reasons. Abortion is barbaric and inhumane.
They are part of the ancillary recommendations of the Citizens Assembly but are completely inadequate on their own.
Much, if not a signficant majority of the No campaigners are against them because theyâre hardcore Catholic fundamenalists.
People like Niamh Nic Mathuna, Cora Sherlock and Justin Barrett - these backward cunts still havenât even come to terms with allowing contraception.
You have a friend who tried to kill her baby so.
Only if you have no personal issue with abortion. Now I believe rape victims who are distraught/depressed feel they cannot or do not wish to go through with the pregnancy should have a right to abortion. But who said this?
"I wouldnât be in favour of abortion⌠it isnât the childâs fault that theyâre the child or rape⌠Even, how would that work practically? I think where thatâs been brought in in countries it has more or less led to abortion on demandâ
I think everyone would agree avoiding an unwanted pregnant is a better answer than abortion, but itâs not the real world is it?
Thatâs one of the most annoying things about ânoâ side. The moral attack by them to the yes side when they clearly have no morals themselves.
It is the real world. Do you apply your same real world logic to drink driving?
Oh sorry - I was talking about abortion. Iâm not sure. Iâd have thought it can be legislated for. I do believe weâre signed up to international treaties so thatâs probably a factor. Itâs probably unlikely that the Catholic Church can reintroduce forced adoption of the children of fallen women to the US so âŚ
That is a critical part of this whole referendum.
Reality. Not faux morals. Dealing with real people and not shouting from the sidelines.
She succeeded.
You donât believe in lifting a finger to help them though. Is that selfish? How would you explain to an unborn child, about to be aborted, why you didnât vote to save them?
Thank god they canât
Heâs probably beating his wife at home.
They probably werenât allowed then either but the nation looked the other way âŚ
No campaigners are generally hardcore Catholics. One wonders have they come to terms with the idea that by constantly lying, they are constantly committing mortal sins, and will probably go to hell as a result?
Sure their heads were turned that way anyway ignoring the priests
I wonder if the likes of the Iona Institute are actual hardcore Catholics or is it just a front for a group of people with business interests to get together and look after each other.
Either way itâs rotten to the core.