Abortion Referendum Thread

AFAIK thereā€™s no image rights upon death. But even so, common courtesy would say reach out to the husband.

Yes I agree that her case, among many, needs discussing but thereā€™s other s such as the woman who bled out in the taxi in the UK and the current holles St judicial review of the investigation into their handling of a death

As for the burning of the poster, all we have is a burnt poster with no idea of who did it.

Who knows if they reached out or not? He has been particularly quiet for a long time, unlike her parents who have strongly advocated a yes vote and kept her in the spotlight.

In my opinion tho, the woman bleeding out in a Taxi in the UK is another reason for having the procedure here, so the proper care is provided to women who go thru the procedure. Of course the argument that if she didnā€™t do it she wouldnā€™t have died, but she did, but had to do it out of the country and getting less medical supervision as a result.

Of course the easy counter to that is that the healthcare you speak of is provided by the HSEā€¦

Exactly, and obviously.

She died from medical negligence.

Brought about by the 8th amendment which ties the hands of medical staff unless the life of the woman was in imminent danger. Read the case posted by @Tank above, itā€™s literally identical to the Savita case.

Should the medical staff in Galway have granted the coupleā€™s wish when they asked for a termination the day she was admitted? Even though she wasnā€™t in imminent danger and the fetus still had a heartbeat?

Of course that should be a factor. Its just not the issue at hand

If you dont you probably shouldnt bother voting

1 Like

Oooooft

Do you know they havent? It sounds like you do

I know by them.

With all due respects. Thats a pile of bollocks of an answer

Because if they had it they wouldā€™ve tweeted as much. They havenā€™t, ergo they didnā€™t ask or get it.

Conflation

And so is her pregnancy treatment if brought to term. So, we donā€™t trust the HSE to carry out abortions but we have to trust them to ensure pregnancies are OK? Works both ways too.

Itā€™s curious to see as we get closer to voting day and with the indications being that repeal will carry the day, campaigners for No are making arguments that we should legislate for hard cases, improve sexual education, increase contraception availability etc. The exact same suspects have campaigned hard against any suggestions of these for the best part of 20 years. It just shows the desperation and cynical dishonesty of these chancers that theyā€™re making out now that theyā€™d support such measures and almost querying why successive governments havenā€™t gotten around to implementing them.

6 Likes

Perhaps @Cicero_Dandi will soften his view that rape victims should be subjected to internal examinations and then arrested for attempting to board an airplane
But I doubt it

Brought about by an inadequate health service where doctors are not accountable for their negligence.

Answer the question you coward. Should the medical staff have carried out the coupleā€™s request to terminate the day she was admitted?

Youā€™re barking up the wrong tree. Itā€™s a clear case of medical negligence from a basket case of a health service where its one scandal after the next.