Labane, perhaps belatedly realising which way the wind was blowing and that he had got things entirely wrong, has fallen on his e-sword, but his much thicker and even more insufferable mini-me is still fighting the fight of the fool.
Am i correct in saying that states such as Massachusetts, Illinois, New York and California, and indeed any state, are not precluded from legislating for abortion?
Yesterdayâs ruling removes the federally mandated constitutional protection of Roe, but does not debar states from legislating as they see fit?
Exactly. It now goes back to each individual state to decide through their own local legislature.
Whatâs more democratic than that - each state deciding for themselves through people who have been voted in themselves by the citizens of each state.
States enact laws that infringe on peopleâs rights all the time. Thatâs why democracies generally have human rights and or constitutional rights enshrined in laws that governments canât break and why we have separation of powers.
Correct. Thatâs democracy in action. If the people donât like the vibe vote in different legislators. Like you said, New York and Mississippi are worlds apart, one law fir all makes no sense. States rights is true democracy. All politics is local after all
Thereâs been lots of articles about it in recent years. Most suggest itâs the right/republicans/headbangers that go off on it. Not much comes of it as the army is agin them. Your scenario is a lot more scary.