The Irish lockdown was only a half arsed attempt, it was never going to be successful. Telling people to stay within 2km of home and waving people through the airports was always destined to fail. I havenāt been hung up on Sweden at all, I just bring it up as proof of how wrong the likes of your good self called it. The general consensus among experts was that the Swedish approach was dangerous and so it proved.
Luckily the majority of people that make decisions took on board the expert advice. Had they been like your good self who wanted to let it rip a lot more lives would have been lost. The likes of the US and UK have paid the price for listening to the likes of Gupta and Tegnelll.
If you consider having ten times the fatalities of your neighbours as having fared no worse, then yes they have fared well. Assuming that to be the case ,why have their government brought in legislation that eanbles them to introduce stricter restrictions.
If you consider having ten times the fatalities of their neighbours as being successful then, go Sweden!! Their government donāt agree with you though.
No- you are totally hung up on it and unable to give a reasoned assessment of it.
So you wanted a harder lockdown then? Are you not consistent critic of AGS? Given that an All Island approach couldnāt happen (as shown earlier) and a change to our trading methods was also not possible, you have essentially advocated for LoCkDowN FoReVa with increased powers to the State and our police force whilst we print money indefinitely to pay for it.
Lolz, unabe to give a reasoned assessment. The Swedish themselves have given a reasoned assessment, why is this so difficult for the mentallers to grasp.
There is a line along the Baltic Sea that renders comparison of COVID deaths moot. You can compare the countries above it to each other and below it to each other but you must never compare Sweden to Germany, Spain or the U.K.
You CAN compare islands in the North Atlantic and the South Pacific no problem though