Cork
Poor man trying to go for a walk on the beach ffs. What harm was he doing
Iāve a genuine issue here. If you accept that lockdowns work (I dont), how long is it morally justifiable to lock a population up for? The longer this goes the worse the fallout will be. Eventually we need to open back up, one way or another.
Could he not go for a walk on the road?
I hope they lock that animal up
A man on his own going to a deserted beach in January in sub zero temperatures and gets fined. I dont think he was a significant epidemiology risk. Jesus Wept.
Itās not pretty to point out that thereās been silence from teachers on the issue of opening schools
I got stopped for the first time on my way to sea swimming this morning. Previously I was sure of beating the checkpoints if I went out before 7:30. Now Iām a little worried.
I told him I was going grocery shopping and he laughed at me in a big Kerry accent and said āYouāre some lad!ā and waved me on.
To talk about the airports checkpoints - would I be right in thinking that you can still get a bus to the airport? Would that work?
They let him off with a warning.
And the Guards boasting about it
You can and in conversation with my brother yesterday who wants to go on holidays for a couple of weeks this was a proposed solution to checkpoints.
The guards must be absolutely mortified having to partake in this nonsense
You can tell them itās essential travel because if you canāt get to the airport you canāt get your flight
Well in the unlikely event that your brother has any interest in my input, I think his plan should work and I wish him a pleasant trip.
No they fined him because he went down the road to another beach. I blame the Happy Pear twins.
He was in contravention of public health regulations and must be punished
Precisely. They let him off without a fine, and he ignored their decency.
The other option I was thinking of was an essential visit to an isolated person living abroad alone.
Whatās the alternative to lockdowns? every time they have opened the country up people have gone mad and weāre looking at deaths of 40-70 ā¦ Saying āsocial distancedā and the reality of it are two different things. I dont understand your moral argumentā¦ are we also not morally responsible for the people contracting the disease , getting sick and dying? Is a society not judged on how it treats itās weakest , not itās strongest?
It was a fantastic bit of crime detection in fairness